Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court: President owes us a moderate
charleston w.v. sunday gazettemail ^ | Oct 1 05 | susanna rodell

Posted on 10/01/2005 11:10:50 PM PDT by churchillbuff

The names are floating around. Who will the president pick to succeed Sandra Day O’Connor?

Since he did such a superb job with John Roberts — finding a candidate to whom it was hard to muster vehement objection from anyone — defenses are up. Uberconservatives think Bush owes them one. They’re waiting for a candidate they can truly trust to finish off the dreaded precedents on reproductive rights and equality of opportunity. They want another Scalia or Thomas.

Liberal Democrats are wary. Roberts was made of Teflon and they’ll have to pronounce on yet another candidate before they can test the new chief justice. They’re on guard.

So they should be. O’Connor has been such an important voice on the court, outside of her status as its first woman. Democrats are rightly determined not to allow the court to heel over to the right, jeopardizing the progress of the postwar years.

What’s a Republican president to do? Resurrecting dead candidates like Priscilla Owen or Janice Rogers Brown — both already filibustered for other appointments — would provoke a nasty confrontation. Democrats have put the White House on notice that they won’t be polite if he offers up such damaged goods.

He should also resist the temptation to nominate Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. Sure, he’s a great pick if you’re looking for a diversity candidate, but the right thinks he’s soft on abortion. And Gonzales is damaged goods, too, because of his association with the disastrous policies on torture and the suspension of the Geneva Conventions in the war on terror.

Confirmation hearings for Gonzales would quickly descend into a contentious rehashing of some of the Bush presidency’s most painful moments, abetted, no doubt, by the recent release of additional grisly material on the Abu Ghraib scandal.

George W. Bush’s presidency is in a different place than it was even a few weeks ago when he first nominated Roberts. His approval ratings are abysmal. He is still struggling to recover his balance after the Katrina disaster. The war in Iraq is going very badly. His FEMA chief has been discredited as a clueless crony, and his party’s leader in the House of Representatives has just been indicted on felony conspiracy charges.

One name being floated at the moment is that of Harriet Miers, who succeeded Gonzales as White House counsel when Gonzales ascended to attorney general.

Miers would seem an attractive candidate: a career corporate lawyer, mature and terminally hardworking. But she was right in the thick of the Gonzales machine when those deadly guidelines were being fashioned. Plus she has never been a judge — not specifically required, but for such a crucial appointment, I’d argue, a pretty good idea.

Bush is looking more lame-duck all the time. What can the right do to him now? They’ve done him few favors recently, and he’s not running again.

A whole generation of smart, talented female and/or minority jurists is out there. There are genuine moderates among them, candidates who might not please the religious right but might be acceptable to mainstream Democrats.

- advertisement -

Frankly, at this point in his presidency, Bush has less to fear from the right. They can howl, but they can’t hurt him much more than he’s hurting already. He badly needs to resurrect his presidency. He needs to find a true moderate, and a moderate woman would be ideal. Both politically and morally, it’s the right thing to do.

Rodell is editorial page editor of the Gazette. She can be reached at srodell@wvgazette.com.

Previous 1 | 2


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; US: West Virginia
KEYWORDS: churchilldisruptor; churchyisnuts; crock; roberts; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last
This liberal calls the Roberts nomination "superb." More reason I was right to be troubled by it.
1 posted on 10/01/2005 11:10:52 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

worry beads

2 posted on 10/01/2005 11:15:39 PM PDT by onyx ((Vicksburg, MS) North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
President owes us a moderate

BALONEY!

3 posted on 10/01/2005 11:16:28 PM PDT by beyond the sea (Doctor, my eyes... tell me what is wrong...was I unwise to leave them open for so long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
This liberal calls the Roberts nomination "superb."

And liberals are always right. LOL!!

4 posted on 10/01/2005 11:16:48 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (If you agree with Marx, the AFL-CIO and E.P.I. please stop calling yourself a conservative!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

LOL!


5 posted on 10/01/2005 11:16:52 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper ("Don't Get Stuck On Stupid!" - Lieutenant General Russell "Ragin' Cajun" Honore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

Please. Stop taking libs at face value. They're acting all happy about Roberts because they don't want to look as bad when they vehemently oppose the next nominee.

Mark Levin approved of Roberts, and that's enough for me.


6 posted on 10/01/2005 11:17:19 PM PDT by Terpfen (http://www.pattonhq.com/unknowntext.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
WAKEUP AMERICA!
Click Here for
Hanoi Kerry
Timeline of a traitor,
includes FBI files



"If the Constitution says that the little guy should win,
the little guy's going to win in court before me.
But if the Constitution says that the big guy should win, well,
then the big guy's going to win,
because my obligation is to the Constitution.
That's the oath," he said.

Judge John Roberts 09/15/05


See You hanoi kerry!
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Roberts
knows U.S. Constitution Amendment 14 Sec 3
He has a lifetime appointnment
and can't be put under political pressure, by anyone.
He's taken an oath to uphold the Constitution

Game's Over hanoi kerry!
There are only 99 legal votes in the US Senate!



7 posted on 10/01/2005 11:17:27 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (There are only 99 legal votes in the US Senate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
What’s a Republican president to do? Resurrecting dead candidates like Priscilla Owen or Janice Rogers Brown — both already filibustered for other appointments — would provoke a nasty confrontation. Democrats have put the White House on notice that they won’t be polite if he offers up such damaged goods.

Oh, I'm scared. 45 no votes means the Dims still lose.

8 posted on 10/01/2005 11:18:10 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (If you agree with Marx, the AFL-CIO and E.P.I. please stop calling yourself a conservative!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
"This liberal calls the Roberts nomination 'superb.'"

She also says the President "owes us a moderate" - implying that Justice Roberts isn't one.

So where's the trouble?
9 posted on 10/01/2005 11:18:49 PM PDT by decal (Mother Nature and Real Life are conservatives; the Progs have never figured this out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
This liberal calls the Roberts nomination "superb." More reason I was right to be troubled by it.

I'd be troubled too if I wasn't the smartest guy in the room.

10 posted on 10/01/2005 11:19:37 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper ("Don't Get Stuck On Stupid!" - Lieutenant General Russell "Ragin' Cajun" Honore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper


LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


11 posted on 10/01/2005 11:20:48 PM PDT by onyx ((Vicksburg, MS) North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

Tired of infanticide being referred to as reproductive rights. Makes as much sense as calling slavery 'property rights.'


12 posted on 10/01/2005 11:21:51 PM PDT by peyton randolph (Warning! It is illegal to fatwah a camel in all 50 states)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen

Absolutely. Roberts proved he was the right guy once he cleaned the Democrat's clock in the committee room.


13 posted on 10/01/2005 11:22:08 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper ("Don't Get Stuck On Stupid!" - Lieutenant General Russell "Ragin' Cajun" Honore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

He shoots, he scores!!!!


14 posted on 10/01/2005 11:22:30 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (If you agree with Marx, the AFL-CIO and E.P.I. please stop calling yourself a conservative!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

"I'd be troubled too if I wasn't the smartest guy in the room."

HaHaHahaha


15 posted on 10/01/2005 11:22:49 PM PDT by KingKongCobra (Trying to save the "Donner Party" from themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
This liberal calls the Roberts nomination "superb." More reason I was right to be troubled by it.

Oh, fer cryin' out loud! You are troubled by anything President Bush does. And you know it.


If you want a Google GMail account, FReepmail me.
They're going fast!

16 posted on 10/01/2005 11:23:44 PM PDT by rdb3 (NON-conservative, American exceptionalist here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
he cleaned the Democrat's clock""

He didn't clean any clocks. He had Shumer and others saying they liked what they heard. All that crap about respect for precedent and Roe being settled law. Roberts is no Thomas or Scalia, that because crystal clear -- and the Dems are happy

17 posted on 10/01/2005 11:24:05 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

We will see soon enough.


18 posted on 10/01/2005 11:25:43 PM PDT by zendari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

Yeah, Schumer liked what he heard and voted No. I don't trust Liberals.


19 posted on 10/01/2005 11:26:26 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper ("Don't Get Stuck On Stupid!" - Lieutenant General Russell "Ragin' Cajun" Honore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
There are genuine moderates among them, candidates who might not please the religious right but might be acceptable to mainstream Democrats.

Yeah, pleasing mainstream Democrats has to be a Bush priority. Okay.
Susanna Rodell is an idiot.

20 posted on 10/01/2005 11:26:26 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson