Posted on 10/01/2005 8:49:01 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
Japan Rethinking Plan for Security Council
By NICK WADHAMS, Associated Press Writer
Fri Sep 30, 8:31 PM ET
Japan has warned Congress that U.S. legislation seeking to withhold United Nations dues could lead Japanese lawmakers to take similar action, possibly resulting in the loss of millions of dollars to the world body, a Japanese diplomat said Friday.
Deputy Ambassador Toshiro Ozawa said he told Rep. Henry Hyde (news, bio, voting record) in a meeting early this month of the possible "unintended consequences" surrounding a bill the Illinois Republican sponsored as a way to force the United Nations to enact a series of reforms. The House of Representatives adopted it June.
"When the U.S. Congress acts, it may impact the thinking of legislators in Japan on this issue because we do know that there is a buildup of frustration on the Japanese side vis-a-vis the United Nations," Ozawa told The Associated Press in an interview.
Japan pays 19.5 percent of the annual U.N. budget of about $2 billion, second only to the United States, which pays about 22 percent.
Ozawa's remarks come as Japan shows increasing signs of displeasure with the U.N. in the weeks since failing to get a permanent seat on the U.N. Security Council. It had allied with three other nations — Brazil, Germany and India — in a quest for permanent seats, but they still lack the support they need in the 191-nation General Assembly.
Since the so-called Group of Four put their bid on hold in August, Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi's government has claimed it is under growing pressure to scale back its dues to the United Nations because people at home no longer believe the country is getting its money's worth.
Dues are determined by a complex formula that is reconsidered every three years in the U.N. budget committee, and Japan could seek to lower its assessment as the United States did in 2000. Then, the United States succeeded in lowering its contribution from 25 percent to 22 percent.
Ozawa said Japan nonetheless wants to work within the U.N. system and rejected the strategy of withholding dues outright.
"As a country we don't like to go into a threatening mode," Ozawa said.
Yet his government has no control over its legislature, putting it in a similar position to the Bush administration. The White House has said as a matter of policy that it opposes withholding dues to the United Nations because doing so could sour relations with other nations and work counter to American interests.
The Bush administration has supported an alternative to Hyde's bill that would give the secretary of state discretion over whether to pay the dues. The earliest such a bill could be enacted would be mid-2006.
There has been no similar move in the Japanese legislature, Ozawa said.
U.N. officials oppose withholding as something that could only delay U.N. reform and alienate other member states.
"We've always felt that withholding dues was not a constructive approach," said Stephane Dujarric, spokesman for Secretary-General Kofi Annan.
Ozawa also said that Japan was reconsidering its approach to reform of the Security Council. While Japan, Brazil, Germany and India remain allied on their proposal for Security Council reform, Tokyo is considering whether to change strategy.
The 35-page document adopted by world leaders at a summit two weeks ago asks the General Assembly to report by the end of the year on progress to reform the Security Council.
Ping!
There's a good cover article in the latest issue of Crisis magazine on the implosion at the UN. The writer comments that the chief supporters of the UN are the Europeans, who find it a useful way of increasing their political influence.
It's ironic that the two nations who pay nearly half the UN's bills have little or nothing to gain from this organization. The main beneficiaries are France, Germany, Belgium, Old Europe, and an assortment of third-world tyrannies.
Japan joining us in whithholding dues, further putting stress on the UN to reform, is somehow supposed to be a DIS-incentive for us to act?
Hell, dudes, go for it.
YAAAAAAY...!
Yes, it is a now Euro's instrument to tie down their rivals via the facade of multilateralism. What Euro cannot get by their military and economic power, they want to achieve via thousand strings of U.N. bureaucracy. It works like a progressive income tax system.
France should be tossed off.
and...The U.N. gone.
I believe the word "warn" should be enterpreted by the world body as "tip off". Perhaps as the scum bags, no Big John is excluded from the list, agonize over how much they could loss, perhaps they shall become a bit more how should we say, malable. About time the jerks get threatened.
"Warned"??? Acted sympathetically is more like it. Now we control 63% of the money rather than just 40%.
"Japan Rethinking Plan for Security Council(might withhold U.N. dues"
This could be a good thing, a bankrupt enemy is a weak enemy, and I for one consider the UN an enemy.
WOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOO! Way to go, Japan! :-)
Someone needs to make the point to these UN
buttmunchs, that they are *NOT* a government!!!
Never were...Never *will* be.
Sounds brilliant to me.
'Japan-is-our-friend' ping.
Yes this is a good start. Now all we have to do is withdraw from the UN and kick their asses out of the US! Im sure a Canada will welcome them with open arms!?
-people at home no longer believe the country is getting its money's worth.-
IMO, you can NEVER get your money's worth from the UN.
Here's hoping!
He who pays the piper calls the tune.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.