I thought they had an agenda as well. It was like they were covering for what the OU Administration was saying.
What was strange was that none of them confronted me directly. If they disagreed with what I was saying, why not ask me direct?
When 2+2 do not add up, you speculate about what if's which is investigative journalism but they wanted none of any speculation that could be checked out. I will say one thing for our local media including the OU Daily -- they are not reporting without sourcing which is why they are sitting on some things.
http://www.channeloklahoma.com/index.html
check out the video titled 'Evacuation Plan'..some wierd dude with a SHAVED head talks about knowing Joel and makes some wierd comments about how analytical he was, etc. Don't suicide bombers shave their heads before a mission? (I know..I got my tin foil hat screwed on too tight..lol)
When anyone says there's not enough info to determine it was terrorism, and then immediately follows that with "it was probably a suicide", you know something's up. If there isn't enough info to determine it was terrorism, there isn't enough info to determine anything else, either. An honest response would be to say it's too early to make any determination.