Well, why don't you tell me why you think there is a cover up here . I say there is simply a lack of facts righ tnow and there is no thing to warrent a suggestion that this was a mini 9/11 inthe works.
the lack of facts may well be understandable at this stage of the investigation - the lack of questions by the media is the real issue.
"Well, why don't you tell me why you think there is a cover up here . I say there is simply a lack of facts righ tnow and there is no thing to warrent a suggestion that this was a mini 9/11 inthe works."
Nice. Try and reverse it.
I asked you to justify the lack of coverage on this story when other inconsequential stories (like Paris Hilton) get major play.
You can't and you to try to reverse the argument.
Hint: It's spelled "warrant".
There are loads of reasons for a cover-up, and not all of them are sinister. This is an NFL day, for starters, and even the lamebrained boys and girls in the MSM know it's probably not a good idea to go blathering on about stadium bombers lest irrational fear creep in or, worse yet, bozo copycats come out of the woodwork.
There's no question this is being soft-pedaled. Let's move the venue and say for example that someone had detonated himself or herself outside a popular New York nightspot last night. You BET there'd be loads of coverage this morning. But since the venue was a football stadium -- a feared terrorist target since at least the '70s -- and we're in the midst of an American Football Weekend, keeping the story under wraps at present would seem a prudent thing, panic-wise, copycat-wise, and otherwise-wise.
I live here -- trust me the media was told not to report certain things. A big blast is heard and not reported on our radio stations? None of us had any idea what was going on until the 4th quarter. And since then the amount of news coming out is almost zero, zip, nada.
hoboken -- did you read The Third Terrorist?