Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: anymouse
Isn't it highly illegal for members of a Grand Jury to talk about their deliberations? If this guy is who he says he is, isn't he admitting that he himself is committing a crime? And a former LEO? Something doesn't smell right here.

Uh, exactly what has he talked about? All he's said is that he believes the indictment he and the others issued was warranted. Not exactly letting out anything we didn't know there.

4 posted on 09/30/2005 7:38:40 PM PDT by SpringheelJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SpringheelJack
It is unethical to discuss ongoing proceedings, talk about contaminating potential jury pool, this one takes the cake. Makes one wonder about any criminal proceedings being fair and impartial in TX.
42 posted on 09/30/2005 8:43:00 PM PDT by Ursus arctos horribilis ("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: SpringheelJack
Uh, exactly what has he talked about? All he's said is that he believes the indictment he and the others issued was warranted. Not exactly letting out anything we didn't know there.

I guess it's OK for a grand jury foreman to go before the media and state he thinks someone he just indicted is guilty? You're telling me that it's proper when he's only heard one side of the story? There is a good reason grand jury members are not suspose to speak out. This man has just tried Delay in front of the public with secret information - in the same manner as Earle. We're to assume they are correct.

83 posted on 10/01/2005 4:35:35 AM PDT by Alissa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson