To: anymouse
Isn't it highly illegal for members of a Grand Jury to talk about their deliberations? If this guy is who he says he is, isn't he admitting that he himself is committing a crime? And a former LEO? Something doesn't smell right here.Uh, exactly what has he talked about? All he's said is that he believes the indictment he and the others issued was warranted. Not exactly letting out anything we didn't know there.
To: SpringheelJack
It is unethical to discuss ongoing proceedings, talk about contaminating potential jury pool, this one takes the cake. Makes one wonder about any criminal proceedings being fair and impartial in TX.
42 posted on
09/30/2005 8:43:00 PM PDT by
Ursus arctos horribilis
("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
To: SpringheelJack
Uh, exactly what has he talked about? All he's said is that he believes the indictment he and the others issued was warranted. Not exactly letting out anything we didn't know there.I guess it's OK for a grand jury foreman to go before the media and state he thinks someone he just indicted is guilty? You're telling me that it's proper when he's only heard one side of the story? There is a good reason grand jury members are not suspose to speak out. This man has just tried Delay in front of the public with secret information - in the same manner as Earle. We're to assume they are correct.
83 posted on
10/01/2005 4:35:35 AM PDT by
Alissa
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson