I guess it's OK for a grand jury foreman to go before the media and state he thinks someone he just indicted is guilty? You're telling me that it's proper when he's only heard one side of the story? There is a good reason grand jury members are not suspose to speak out. This man has just tried Delay in front of the public with secret information - in the same manner as Earle. We're to assume they are correct.
Welcome to indictments. I know there's a law, I'm just doubtful anything said here in this article violates it. It goes without saying that the foreman of a jury which issued the indictment thought the action was warranted. And that's all that gets said here.