Your question has nothing to do with the "point" you were attempting to make, which is that teaching it in public schools is somehow a church/state violation. Any theory can be thought of by some people as supporting their religion. There are certainly plenty of atheists who see Darwinism that way.
It's not a scientific theory, it's a proseytizing mechanism for fundamentalist protestants. Dembski says so.
Liar. He did not say that it wasn't a scientific theory. That's why you guys are losing this public debate. You simply can not address the issue honestly.
Liar. He did not say that it wasn't a scientific theory.
I never said he did. I said he said it's a proselytizing mechanism for fundamentalist protestants. Before you start calling names, learn some basic syntax.
That's why you guys are losing this public debate. You simply can not address the issue honestly.
Snicker. Let's see, so far it's transpired at the Dover trial that creationists have burned artwork depicting evolution, turned school board meetings into religious services, and harassed unbelievers. Way to win the public debate.