Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: inquest
It's not a scientific theory, it's a proseytizing mechanism for fundamentalist protestants. Dembski says so.

Liar. He did not say that it wasn't a scientific theory.

I never said he did. I said he said it's a proselytizing mechanism for fundamentalist protestants. Before you start calling names, learn some basic syntax.

That's why you guys are losing this public debate. You simply can not address the issue honestly.

Snicker. Let's see, so far it's transpired at the Dover trial that creationists have burned artwork depicting evolution, turned school board meetings into religious services, and harassed unbelievers. Way to win the public debate.

364 posted on 10/01/2005 8:55:30 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies ]


To: Right Wing Professor
Learn a little syntax yourself. When you say "Dembski says so", you're implying that he agreed with your entire statement. Don't blame me for your inability to make your point clearly. And don't try to divert the focus elsewhere if you can't make an honest point.
366 posted on 10/01/2005 9:02:39 AM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson