Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman

"What? Back up the turnip truck and explain that one. I missed something."

Please explain the nature of the "pocket" of reverse entropy that caused inanimate material to "randomly" organize in a complex fashion, thus leading to life.

The turnip truck reference is hilarious by the way! I feel like such a redneck. Good one! You so damn funny, I tell you what.


131 posted on 09/30/2005 3:42:31 PM PDT by RightInEastLansing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: RightInEastLansing
Please explain the nature of the "pocket" of reverse entropy that caused inanimate material to "randomly" organize in a complex fashion, thus leading to life.

Entropy can be reversed in systems with external energy input. Why would you believe otherwise?
145 posted on 09/30/2005 3:50:41 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

To: RightInEastLansing
Please explain the nature of the "pocket" of reverse entropy that caused inanimate material to "randomly" organize in a complex fashion, thus leading to life.

The turnip truck reference is hilarious by the way! I feel like such a redneck. Good one! You so damn funny, I tell you what.

In relation to the second law of thermodynamics, might it be about the same as the buildup of complex elements during the lifecycle of stars? Lots of things get organized in a complex fashion. Certainly this does not violate the second law.

Isn't "entropy" kind of an overall average, with lots of local differences, such as you and me? Haven't studied that part of science in a while so if someone else wants to jump in please do so.

I think there was another post on this asking about the first and third laws?

As far as the turnip truck quip, glad you liked it. I prefer to deal with these subjects with some humor if possible. Better than name calling.

148 posted on 09/30/2005 3:53:40 PM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

To: RightInEastLansing

my understanding was that darwin was interested in the origin of species, not the origin of life.
does anyone on this thread know if darwin ever claimed that life originated from non-living matter?


182 posted on 09/30/2005 4:11:05 PM PDT by drhogan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson