To: Prime Choice
I was under the impression carbon dating isn't reliable past 50,000 years or so.
19 posted on
09/30/2005 9:25:11 AM PDT by
mlc9852
To: mlc9852
I was under the impression carbon dating isn't reliable past 50,000 years or so. That's why I said coupled with at what level in the strata the amber was discovered.
27 posted on
09/30/2005 9:28:17 AM PDT by
Prime Choice
(E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
To: mlc9852
You were right. It also doesn't work on things that are too young. Live clams have been dating as having been dead for years. So basically, the whole dating system is crap.
41 posted on
09/30/2005 9:41:48 AM PDT by
Tim Long
(No, Christine Todd Whitman, it's not your party too.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson