To: mysterio
Seems to me the judge wouldn't have had to order a damned thing if this girl wouldn't have been in her court. Right?
34 posted on
09/30/2005 7:59:56 AM PDT by
InsureAmerica
(Evil? I have many words for it. We are as dust, to them. - v v putin)
To: InsureAmerica
Seems to me the judge wouldn't have had to order a damned thing if this girl wouldn't have been in her court. Right?
So, you support judicial activism when it applies to criminals? It's ok for judges to force their moral views on criminals as a condition of probation? You are ok with liberal judges forcing conservative people to follow liberal morals as a condition of probation?
41 posted on
09/30/2005 8:04:51 AM PDT by
mysterio
To: InsureAmerica
Not only in her court, but a convicted, minor in her court.
I get tired of hearing about convicts rights. Convicts give up rights. They do not have the right to freedom, to carry weapons, association, to vote, etc.
A minor can certainly lose the "right" to have intercourse.
46 posted on
09/30/2005 8:06:48 AM PDT by
FarmerW
To: InsureAmerica
I dunno, it seems as silly to me as a judge saying you are prohibited from eating junk food.
86 posted on
09/30/2005 9:38:23 AM PDT by
Romish_Papist
(New photos on my FR Page.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson