Posted on 09/30/2005 5:07:37 AM PDT by DogByte6RER
Bush selling out America
By: FREEMAN SAWYER
George Bush cares nothing about the security of the United States. He is selling out our country every day. No matter what some may say about his efforts in other areas, he continues to destroy our country simply out of greed. The national security of our country is critical to our survival, and no explanation can justify the president's refusal to defend our borders.
When Bill Clinton sold U.S. classified computer technology to the Chinese, we vowed to never forget his crime. Bush's continuing treachery is every bit as bad, or worse. When did party loyalty become more important than saving our country? True patriots put country before party.
Normally, I am the last one to give up on a person, and I have been secretly hoping for the president's conscience to kick in before it's too late. However, I cannot continue to stand idly by with the stakes so high and the danger too close.
Perhaps there are still a few Republicans out there who will continue to wear their blinders as our country becomes populated by masses who come here full of hate for us and what we stand for.
I can hear their excuses even now: "I know Bush was wrong on illegal immigration, but look how tough he stayed on Iraq."
Winning in Iraq won't mean a thing if we lose the battle at home. One without the other is not victory. George Bush has already begun the destruction of the Republican Party because of illegal immigration. The survival of the party will be meaningless if we become another Mexico ---- corrupt and impoverished. How would you like Nuevo Laredo to be your hometown?
Information about Bush's latest "guest worker plan" is starting to seep out. Those now in the country illegally get a free pass to stay permanently. New guest workers will be allowed to stay for six years before they go home ---- but who will make them go? For the past five years, Bush has failed to deport people, even when he knows they are here illegally.
Who will have the political courage to deport guest workers after they have been here six years? Most Americans are demanding no guest workers "who only come here to do jobs Americans won't do because they just want a better life for themselves and their family." More than 80 percent of Americans are demanding Bush seal the border at once, but his plan does no such thing because the rich contributors to the Republican Party have become addicted to cheap labor.
Does anyone really believe Bush's plan will solve the illegal immigration problem? This plan only proves that greed is a higher priority than the opinion of most Americans, their common sense and their national security.
And, what about those who continue to cross illegally? There is no provision in the plan for how long it will be until they are granted amnesty.
Bush's appointment of a highly underqualified person, Julie Myers, to head Immigration and Customs Enforcement is just one more example of the arrogance of this president. The primary duty of ICE is to apprehend alien terrorists. Why would he select a person lacking experience to head this mammoth national security and law enforcement agency if his plan wasn't for it to fail?
Did he not learn anything from the FEMA debacle? Of course, he did. Failure is what he wants, because failure to enforce our immigration laws is what he most desires.
Freeman Sawyer of Camarillo is a member of the Temecula-based Citizens Activists for a Secure America.
Agreed, but they can do so much more damage in those 4-8 years.
Do not try to marginalize the issue of the illegal invasion by calling me a "wingnut". It won't work any more, the base is wise to RINO BS. If the GOP cannot handle the issue, there will be changes in the GOP. I will be at the caucuses, assemblies, and conventions making that happen.
Nothing makes me as mad as an administration which has been bought off from enforcing the law (or is that a "wingnut" idea too).
Then I suggest you watch who you call a RINO.
And yes, this administration being bought off is a wingnut idea.
Don't forget the time he and Cheyney tried to steal Christmas to give it to their rich oil buddies, then gave the clean-up contract to Halliburton.
Sounds like 104, he he. :P
Yeah, I spelled Cheney wrong. :D
You gotta watch out for that evil, vicious, Dick Cheney. It's really not George Bush's fault..its Cheney's!!! /sarc
Thanks for a great post.
Ok, your not a RINO. So how do you explain the lack of enforcement of our laws. The buck stops at the White House. It is the federal government that is ordering my local law enforcement to let the illegals go when they catch them. That is just plain wrong.
"HOWEVER, a president has term limitations, and career congressmen do not. This is a very significant difference."
Agreed, but they can do so much more damage in those 4-8
years.
*Yes, a president CAN as well proven (by too many cites for here) by the Clintons' 8-year dual presidency. Certainly, a president's appointees can be problematic as well. Sec. of State Madeline Albright sowed more antiAmerican sentiment than good will in 8 years, and she seems to continue to do so as a private citizen.
We do have a theoretical constituted balance of powers. But, this nation is severely plagued by a two-party system with each vieing for power leverage on the gameboard at a great cost to America's resources and revenue, and a detriment to the well-being of the American productive majority citizenry. I am of an age which gives me a contemporaneous historical perspective that younger generations do not have. Their perceptions are based on a limited timeline and a very limiting education. Their scope of knowledge is hardly broader than political partylines and media mantras.
The first American president, George Washington, warned about the emergence of party partisanship zealots who would emulate Britains' Whigs vs the Tories infighting.
If there is a silent moral majority then it should form a viable party dedicated to adhering to American governance precepts and traditional social ideals which by definition are truly progressive. Thus, leaving the anemic Republicans and the socialist Democrats in the stale dust of their own making.
I am sick of all this wasteful wanton political crap.
After 9/11 he could have, should have, and had an obligation to secure the border. To always blame the libs for our not doing what should be done is tired, lazy, and infantile. GWB has become simply not credible anymore because of this.
How in good conscious can he talk about the Iraq border while ours is a sive?
Look on any corner or go shopping in any mall, these invaders are slowly suffocating us to death like the frog in ever increasingly warm water who dies a slow death.
*Actually, last month I was shopping in Keene, NH and went into Sears. I was surprised to see the Aisle Signs were both in English and Spanish. I am not aware of a significant Spanish speaking population in NH! I have yet to met anyone who speaks and reads only Spanish. I am brushing up on my Spanish - Mexican Spanish is very idiomatic. I studied formal Castellian Spanish with the lispy "D" (as in verdad pronounced verdath.) I want to be prepared for WHATEVER covertly imposed socio-politico engineering in the near future. Very strange...
I neither wrote the article, nor answered anything.
Oh, of course not! We must never forget that Halliburton is The Kingdom of SatanTM. (They actually make a *gasp* profit dontcha know.)
"I neither wrote the article, nor answered anything."
Huh? Have I said you did or did not? Explain, please.
Call anyone with a Nextel phone and you will see what the heck is going on.
These past few years have been a nightmare in these areas.
The INS has been doing random sweeps for illegals for years. When they tried to do it in California, the local officials would not allow them. So it's not just the Feds fault.
But I'm with you, if an illegal is caught in a criminal act, he should be deported immediately. There is no excuse for that not happening.
Actually we wouldn't need to round up any illegal aliens. Instead, we need to:
1) Cut illegal aliens off from all taxpayer funded services.
2) Crack down hard on employers who hire illegal aliens.
3) Kick able-bodied Americans off of welfare.
4) If necessary, increase the number of LEGAL immigrants that we let into the United States.
By doing these things, illegal aliens would have no access to any jobs or any taxpayer funded freebies. Most illegal aliens would likely make the decision to voluntarily return to their home countries.
What question did I graciously answer?
Who are these "anti-immigration folks" that you're referring to?
3) A substantial percentage of Hispanics regard this sort of thing as racist, i.e. 'We don't want any more of THOSE people in OUR country.' What politician in his right mind is going to infuriate the fastest growing bloc of voters in the country?
A substantial percentage of Hispanics living in the United States view illegal immigration as a major problem that needs to be addressed:
40% of Hispanic voters voted in favor of the anti-illegal alien measure Prop 187 in California in 1994.
47% of Hispanic voters voted in favor of the anti-illegal alien measure Prop 200 in Arizona last year.
A Time magazine poll done in August of this year showed that 61% of Hispanics rated illegal immigration as a "serious problem."
A recent survey conducted by the Pew Hispanic Center found that 60% of U.S.-born Hispanics support laws that deny driver's licenses to illegal aliens.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.