Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How dying Orwell avoided the clutches of the taxman
The Daily Telegraph (UK) ^ | 30th September, 2005 | Ben Fenton

Posted on 09/30/2005 2:52:54 AM PDT by propertius

George Orwell, author and lifelong socialist, entered into a tax avoidance scheme on his deathbed as money began to flood in from the success of his final two books, Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty-Four.

He was seeking to escape the full weight of the Labour government's punishing surtax regime as all his royalties arrived in a short period and he feared leaving his widow and six-year-old son with a gigantic bill for death duties.

After Orwell died, his accountants underplayed the copyright value of those two great works, which between them have sold millions of copies in dozens of languages, by telling the Inland Revenue they were mere "topical bestsellers" with short sales lives.

They also diminished the taxman's expectations of the Orwell estate benefiting from the sale of film rights to both books with the bizarre reasoning that Hollywood might find them too anti-communist in tone and not want to offend the Soviet Union.

Papers relating to Orwell's tax records have only now come to light with the release at the National Archives in Kew of the Inland Revenue file for Eric Arthur Blair, the author's real name.

The file includes the document setting out the "service agreement", made while Orwell was dying of tuberculosis in a small sanatorium at Cranham, near Gloucester, that was intended to protect him and his estate from the crippling surtax regime of the time.

It takes the form of the "minutes" of the first meeting of a company called George Orwell Productions Limited held on April 19, 1949, nine months before his death.

Listed as present is only one name, "E. A. Blair" - Orwell himself.

The minutes have only one item on the agenda, the service agreement, which says: "In consideration of Mr Blair agreeing that all Fees, Royalties etc. received by him as Journalist, Author, Lecturer, Broadcaster etc. and that all the copyrights of all Books, Articles, Plays etc. written by him during the term of his employment are to be the property of the Company, IT WAS RESOLVED that the Company should employ Mr Blair for a period of Fifteen Years from the 6th April 1949 at a salary of Two thousand pounds (£2,000) per annum plus such Bonus as may be voted each year at the discretion of the Board."

After consulting Jack Harrison, his accountant, Orwell paid himself the equivalent of a salary of about £126,000 at today's prices because it would attract relatively less tax than the lump sum expected from the royalties of Nineteen Eighty-Four, which turned out to be six times greater in the following tax year. He had ignored Harrison's advice to do this after the publication of Animal Farm in 1945 and paid crippling taxes in 1947 as a result. Now, with the success of Nineteen Eighty-Four assured, he seemed to have determined not to make the same mistake again.

The scheme was drawn up with the knowledge of both men that Orwell was unlikely to draw much more than a year's salary before his death.

Orwell noted ironically at the bottom of the "minutes" that "the Assistant Secretary was instructed to write to Mr Blair confirming the above arrangement".

Orwell referred to the riches that he earned only at the end of his life as "fairy gold" because he knew he could never spend it.

After Orwell's death at the University College Hospital in January 1950, Mr Harrison took on the Inland Revenue, which was keen to tax every penny from the estate.

The file shows a detailed correspondence between the taxman and Orwell's lawyers.

In one question, the Revenue asks why the American copyright on Animal Farm has been valued at £500, relatively lower than a collection of essays Dickens, Dali and Others.

"Your point is appreciated but its strength is somewhat diminished by reason of the fact that the demand for Animal Farm as a topical best-seller may, apart from any unexpected boost as a result of the deceased's death, be expected to be now exhausted."

In fact, American sales of the book topped eight million by 1970, about the same as Nineteen Eighty-Four.

Of that masterpiece, the solicitors said that a professional copyright valuer believed sales would "dwindle fairly rapidly".

"The fall from 4,528 sales in the six months ending 30.6.50 to 821 in the three months ending 31.10.50 supports his view and indicates that future sales will very rapidly decline," they told the taxman. The Revenue was also licking its lips about the film rights to the books, the files show, pointing out that Orwell must have recognised their value because he specifically mentioned them as a bequest in his will.

But the solicitors bent all logic to try to play down the value of the rights, the new documents show.

"It should also be borne in mind here that the only books worthy of filming are Nineteen Eighty-Four and Animal Farm and are in a strongly anti-communist tone and would be regarded by film companies as an extremely risky proposition as, by the time that these films could be made and put on the market (which would take 2 or 3 years from the date of contract) friendly relations may have been established with the USSR and it would then be extremely difficult if not impossible to secure a showing of the films."

Both books were filmed twice in the 20th century and commercially successful.

DJ Taylor, a biographer of Orwell, said of the newly-discovered files: "It is very poignant that he only earned this money when he knew he was dying.

"I would defend the man to the death, but I think in this case he was being quite naïve because I don't think if he had really understood what was going on that he would have really approved of a scheme that cheated the state of income."

But Prof Peter Davison, the editor of the 20-volume Complete Works Of George Orwell, said that the author's motivation was easy to understand.

"He was very worried about providing for his son, Richard, a boy who he could not even see for his last few months such was the fear of passing on the tuberculosis.

"I think this shows that he was doing what he could to provide for his son."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: england; ericblair; georgeorwell; orwell; tax; uk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 09/30/2005 2:52:55 AM PDT by propertius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: propertius
Any father would do the same for his son. Its the state that acted counter to human nature by seeking to deprive his family of the means to sustain its livelihood.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
2 posted on 09/30/2005 2:56:52 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: propertius

in this case he was being quite naïve because I don't think if he had really understood what was going on that he would have really approved of a scheme that cheated the state of income."

Oh, I think he understood all too well!


3 posted on 09/30/2005 3:02:23 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

One wonders whether, if he'd lived longer, he would have modified his socialist views or become a limousine liberal. Since he was staunchly anti-communist and a very bright man it's impossible to say.


4 posted on 09/30/2005 3:02:40 AM PDT by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tet68
By the end of his life Orwell was no longer a socialist and understood all too well where Labour's policies would lead to. It begins by punishing success. Isn't that what we've been told - socialism is really about mandating equality of misery? Orwell was astute enough not wish that fate upon his own family.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
5 posted on 09/30/2005 3:05:08 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry

Orwell went slumming in his youth in Paris and elsewhere, literally becoming a bum to gain "Experience" as a writer. Although he was a socialist, he was also very anti-Stalin, unlike H.G. Wells.


6 posted on 09/30/2005 3:05:45 AM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel (The Democratic Party-Jackass symbol, jackass leaders, jackass supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
If you read his last books, its clear his views had changed significantly. I don't think he would have written books critical of Stalin's Russia if he still felt socialism was the last best hope of mankind. Quite simply, he was a prophet ahead of his time.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
7 posted on 09/30/2005 3:07:09 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel
He once was a staunch socialist but grew disillusioned with the doctrine. And the anti-wealth policies of the U.K new Labour Government certainly didn't endear him to continue favoring it. He had a reality check about what the pursuit of extreme equality really meant and the lesson hit close to home in its impact upon his own family.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
8 posted on 09/30/2005 3:10:06 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: propertius
"I would defend the man to the death, but I think in this case he was being quite naïve because I don't think if he had really understood what was going on that he would have really approved of a scheme that cheated the state of income."

Yes, we all bellyfeel it was Big Brother's to begin with. And saving this money for others is ungood.

Be a goodthinker.

9 posted on 09/30/2005 3:14:36 AM PDT by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avg_freeper

Orwell obviously was not cheating anyone of anything. It was his money and his accountants appear to have worked well within the law. Besides, a fellow dieing of tuberculosis in 1950 could hardly be faulted for failing to anticipate sales of his writings in 1970.


10 posted on 09/30/2005 3:17:59 AM PDT by muawiyah (/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again? How'bout a double sarcasm for this one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: avg_freeper
Socialism sounds lovely in theory but is utterly unworkable in practice. Name one socialist society that has made its people freer and happier. People didn't see that in the 30s and 40s but in this century there's no excuse. The sad thing is there are people in America who want to inflict that failure upon this country. It would be a human tragedy of colossal proportions.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
11 posted on 09/30/2005 3:19:46 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
And I take exception to the notion your earnings belong to the government. For certain politicians, your merely being rich is a crime. And here is where there's a sickening double standard: its okay for them to be rich but heaven forbid if you do make into the top income bracket. You're looked upon as a criminal and your hard work has earned you the perverse presumption that it needs to be taken away from you for the "common good." The logic here is if you have too good a life then no one should have a life as good as yours.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
12 posted on 09/30/2005 3:24:11 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

I believe the Spanish civil war was his wake-up call. More reds died at the hands of other reds in that conflict than from the guns of Franco's troops. This context was also the origin of the term "political correctness." Being a politically incorrect member of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade's side was a capital offense.


13 posted on 09/30/2005 3:25:15 AM PDT by TomSmedley (Calvinist, optimist, home schooling dad, exuberant husband, technical writer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TomSmedley
Yes... if socialism is about brotherhood, I think that's where Orwell's doubts about it were planted so to speak. It didn't seem like people where fighting for the things they claimed to care about. It wasn't the Franco fascists who defeated the Left insomuch as the fact the Left turned on itself.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
14 posted on 09/30/2005 3:29:34 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Socialism is a scavenging parasite. First it destroys a society from within. Then it feeds on it's rotting corpse.

All it's proponents know that Socialism is doomed to failure. They're there to profit off the collapse. That's the cycle that Marx wrote about, order and revolution.

It's the sick nihilistic belief that it's better to live in a stagnant cycle of upheaval than to leave the people alone and let society naturally advance.

15 posted on 09/30/2005 3:30:27 AM PDT by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: propertius

DAMN! I was hoping that he had found a way to take it with him!

Mark


16 posted on 09/30/2005 3:34:44 AM PDT by MarkL (I didn't get to where I am today by worrying about what I'd feel like tomorrow!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: propertius
Those Freepers of a historical bent may recall that General (and later President) Grant literally spent the last days of his life completing his memoirs while dying of throat cancer (thereby securing the financial future of his wife and son).

Of course, his estate did not have to face the Inland Revenue's American cousin, the IRS, since it didn't exist at the time.
17 posted on 09/30/2005 3:36:20 AM PDT by Captain Rhino ("If you will just abandon logic, these things will make a lot more sense to you!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avg_freeper

I kinda went apostrophe happy on the its there.


18 posted on 09/30/2005 3:39:24 AM PDT by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

"...his accountants appear to have worked well within the law. "

Yes, they did a good job for him and his estate. Good for them. I must say that 1984 is one of the best books I ever read, I found it absolutely chilling, it scared the heck out of me and I don't think you could pay me to read it again. My daughter, no big reader by any means, also thought it was excellent, but she's a lot more cold-blooded than I am and has actually read it twice (for school, of course, both times).

I guess I should really read Animal Farm. Orwell is a fine writer, I very much have enjoyed everything I've read of his. Just a very good, very clear, style.

Good for him for giving the taxman as little as possible, it's as much as they ever deserve.


19 posted on 09/30/2005 3:41:00 AM PDT by jocon307 (Sorry for my bad attitude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Captain Rhino
Yes. Here in liberal California, we repealed the state death tax in 1982... so I'm not left completely penniless. My estate is under a million dollars, so I don't owe federal estate taxes. Whatever nut thought the IRS deserved to take 55% of a dying man's assets invented the most infernal scheme known to the human race. No wonder people to this day still figure out how they can cheat the IRS and leave their inheritance to their heirs.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
20 posted on 09/30/2005 3:42:28 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson