Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/29/2005 10:22:07 PM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Plutarch

Sir Francis Bacon is going to be mad when he hears this.


2 posted on 09/29/2005 10:55:43 PM PDT by willyd (Good Fences Make Good Neighbors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Plutarch
“These are some of the greatest works of literature in human history,” says Anderson, who adds that Americans, Australians, South Africans, Poles and Japanese all love Shakespeare’s work for the very human element in it.

In other words, there is a wide audience for this conspiracy book.

I'm sure it'll do well, but it could use an alien or two. Maybe a vampire.

APf

4 posted on 09/29/2005 11:08:17 PM PDT by APFel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Plutarch
There is not one shred of evidence that de Vere, Bacon, or anybody else wrote Shakespeare's works.

Anderson says King Lear is actually based on de Vere’s own life experience, dividing up his wealth among his own three daughters.

Utter rot. "King Lear" is based on the account in Holinshed's Chronicles, with tips from an anonymous play published in 1594 called "King Leir".

that de Vere had an extramarital affair that went awry and led to a Montague-and-Capulet-like street war in London.

"Romeo and Juliet" is a dramatization of the 1562 poem by Arthur Brooke called "Romeus and Juliet".

5 posted on 09/29/2005 11:15:01 PM PDT by SpringheelJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Plutarch
OMG...not this garbage again! Shakespeare wrote Shakespeare's stuff. I've been reading and studying this stuff longer than the author of this tripe has been alive. That's it, end of conversation.
6 posted on 09/29/2005 11:19:03 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Plutarch
Was the Bard really the Bard?

Not after he was dis-bard.

8 posted on 09/29/2005 11:33:05 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Plutarch
Was the Bard really the Bard?

Well, The Illiad was actually not written by Homer, but by another man of the same name.

10 posted on 09/29/2005 11:48:42 PM PDT by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Plutarch

Not this again. Every few years someone re-dis-invents the wheel and claims that Shakespeare wasn't the author of his works. There are a couple of disputed works, but they are generally omitted from the canon, anyway.


11 posted on 09/29/2005 11:48:46 PM PDT by fqued (You don't have to fight every fight, you don't have to win every battle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Plutarch

This again? What's this got to do with Darwin?


12 posted on 09/29/2005 11:51:46 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Plutarch

The columnist Joseph Sobran wrote a similar book about 7 years ago. He is convinced that it's De Vere, too.


19 posted on 09/30/2005 12:35:19 AM PDT by Neanderthal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Plutarch

Actually, I think the writer of Shakespeare's works were little green men from Mars. My source is George Noory's Coast To Coast AM program.


25 posted on 09/30/2005 7:34:28 AM PDT by righttackle44 (The most dangerous weapon in the world is a Marine with his rifle and the American people behind him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Plutarch
Why did Freud not think that Shakespeare was written by him, anybody know?
26 posted on 09/30/2005 7:40:53 AM PDT by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson