Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fortheDeclaration
demonstrating the viability of abiogenesis has no bearing on whether or not speciation through mutation and selection is valid.

It would 'falsify' Creationism, since we state that all life must come from life.

I wish that were true. I really do wish it would be that simple, that you folks would be slapped into facing reality with so little effort. Unfortunately, this is not the case. Your side would AUTOMATICALLY fall back on the next goalpost: "But living things DESIGNED THAT EXPERIMENT, so all that proves is that Intelligent Design is a fact and that life still came from life!"

I know this for a fact: I've seen it happen on many CREVO threads.

Quit lying about yourselves and your standards.

492 posted on 09/30/2005 12:54:40 PM PDT by King Prout (19sep05 - I want at least 2 Saiga-12 shotguns. If you have leads, let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies ]


To: King Prout
demonstrating the viability of abiogenesis has no bearing on whether or not speciation through mutation and selection is valid.

Sure it does, since Macro evolution had to have a start, and if life cannot come from non-life, there is no Evolution-period.

But you evolutionists know you can't get past abiogenesis so you run from it (although you have been trying to prove it for years)

It would 'falsify' Creationism, since we state that all life must come from life. I wish that were true. I really do wish it would be that simple, that you folks would be slapped into facing reality with so little effort. Unfortunately, this is not the case. Your side would AUTOMATICALLY fall back on the next goalpost: "But living things DESIGNED THAT EXPERIMENT, so all that proves is that Intelligent Design is a fact and that life still came from life!" I know this for a fact: I've seen it happen on many CREVO threads.

Well, as long as you know it to be fact.

How could any Creationist make that statement when Evolution hasn't proven that life can come from non-life.

Quit lying about yourselves and your standards.

No, you stop setting up strawmen arguments.

If Evolutionists could prove life could come from non-life they would have proven Evolution (Macro) is possible.

As it stands today (in the real world) all life must come from life.

That is what we call a Law.

Show that it is not a law and you have disproven a central tenet of Creationism, no matter what Creationists say.

But there is still hope!

Maybe the Aliens that you Evolutionists are looking for will show you how they came from non-life!

That was what Sagan was looking for, wasn't he with his 'billions and billions' of years nonsense.

He knows better now.

495 posted on 09/30/2005 1:13:11 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Gal.4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson