Skip to comments.
US forces 'out of control', says Reuters chief
Guardian ^
| 9/28/05
| Guardian
Posted on 09/28/2005 3:00:21 PM PDT by jmc1969
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1580244,00.html
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: alreuters; americahaters; bushhaters; eurotrash; reuters; wahabbiapologists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
1
posted on
09/28/2005 3:00:22 PM PDT
by
jmc1969
To: jmc1969
2
posted on
09/28/2005 3:00:32 PM PDT
by
jmc1969
To: jmc1969
What? They're shooting the enemy!
3
posted on
09/28/2005 3:02:03 PM PDT
by
Crazieman
(6-23-2005, Establishment of the United Socialist States of America)
To: jmc1969
They should be shot as spies.
4
posted on
09/28/2005 3:03:13 PM PDT
by
Paleo Conservative
(France is an example of retrograde chordate evolution.)
To: jmc1969
Well, Rueters can KMA...they're only a moutpiece to the evil scourge in that areaa...and they're only upset that they have "no control" over the US Military...
Rueters ESAD....
I realize this isn't a very eloquent rant, but diplomacy has failed with these idiots unwilling to report balanced news...what they call journalism, I call propaganda for terrorists, and Rueters should be treated accordingly.
5
posted on
09/28/2005 3:03:39 PM PDT
by
in hoc signo vinces
("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis.")
To: jmc1969
US forces admitted killing three Reuters journalists, ...In addition to all the other enemy combatants and insurgents.
6
posted on
09/28/2005 3:03:58 PM PDT
by
VoiceOfBruck
(You keep lyin' when you oughta be truthin')
To: jmc1969
OH THE HUGE MANATEE!!!!!!
7
posted on
09/28/2005 3:04:39 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
To: jmc1969
and preventing full coverage of the war reaching the public.Hey, the MSM is completely responsible if the full coverage of the war isn't reaching the public.
8
posted on
09/28/2005 3:04:41 PM PDT
by
My2Cents
(The political battles of our day are battles over morality, between the haves and the have nots.)
To: jmc1969
Maybe the media should familiarize themselves with the military's rules of engagement.
To: jmc1969
There'd be no problem if Reuters didn't hire terrorists to be reporters.
10
posted on
09/28/2005 3:05:21 PM PDT
by
narby
To: jmc1969
Are these journalists aware that they are operating in a war zone?
Lots of bullets and explosions and stuff.
11
posted on
09/28/2005 3:06:12 PM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: jmc1969
The detention and accidental shootings of journalists is limiting how journalists can operate, wrote David Schlesinger, the Reuters global managing editor, in a letter to Senator John Warner, head of the armed services committee.I thought they just made up stories from their hotels as it's too dangerous to go out into the "quagmire"?
The Reuters news service chief referred to "a long parade of disturbing incidents whereby professional journalists have been killed, wrongfully detained, and/or illegally abused by US forces in Iraq".
US Forces are killing, detaining, and abusing journalists in Iraq? GREAT!!
12
posted on
09/28/2005 3:06:26 PM PDT
by
DTogo
(I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
To: jmc1969
Tell rooters "journalists" (cough) to get the islamofascist terrorists to protect them, that's whose side they are on anyway.........
13
posted on
09/28/2005 3:06:37 PM PDT
by
federal
To: jmc1969
Guardian not a valid news source.
To: jmc1969
And whose control are they out of?
Reuters is completely immersed in anti-American hatred. If they would stop hiring insurgent sympathisers as "journalists" maybe judt maybe they wouldn't be shot at.
15
posted on
09/28/2005 3:07:26 PM PDT
by
bubman
To: jmc1969
Same song third verse. Started in Afghanistan in fall of 2001. More of the "targeting journalists" nonsense. Wonder if this guy will be forced to resign like the loony at CNN who made the SAME accusation a year ago with NO evidence.
16
posted on
09/28/2005 3:07:57 PM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(Don't get stuck on stupid now, reporters)
To: jmc1969
Hey, if you are a bad guy, don't piss off our troops. Note to all "Journalists" (I use THAT word lightly) and photogs, maybe a POSITIVE story once in a while, maybe even HALF the time! Make the troops WANT to protect you. Now there's an idea!
17
posted on
09/28/2005 3:09:26 PM PDT
by
Danae
( Anál nathrach, orth' bháis's bethad, do chél dénmha)
To: jmc1969
Most Brits I know won't read the Guardian. It's a rag even by their standards.
18
posted on
09/28/2005 3:10:00 PM PDT
by
tgusa
(USN A-6 pilot)
To: Daralundy
Guardian not a valid news source. And neither is Reuters. After 9/11, they refused to call the hijackers "terrorists." To them, one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. Reuters is pure evil.
19
posted on
09/28/2005 3:10:28 PM PDT
by
JellyJam
(Headline of the year: "The Painful Truth: All the World Terrorists Are Muslims!")
To: jmc1969
"The detention and accidental shootings of journalists is limiting how journalists can operate, wrote David Schlesinger, the Reuters global managing editor, in a letter to Senator John Warner, head of the armed services committee"
Disgusting. Shootings of journalists should not be happening by a lucky accident, but as a standard operating procedure.
20
posted on
09/28/2005 3:11:43 PM PDT
by
GSlob
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson