To: PatrickHenry
Your links do nothing to show that ID is scientifically incorrect.
14 posted on
09/28/2005 5:15:13 AM PDT by
NVD
To: NVD
Your links do nothing to show that ID is scientifically incorrect.There is no possible form of evidence that could make ID incorrect. That is its primary problem.
18 posted on
09/28/2005 6:14:33 AM PDT by
js1138
(Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
To: NVD
Your links do nothing to show that ID is scientifically incorrect.Let's see...PH posted those links at 6:15...you started posting on this thread slightly under an hour later. We're all to understand that you read and comprehended that entire body of material, including the additional links in Ichneumon's post, in under an hour, and came to the above brilliant conclusion. Uh huh.
31 posted on
09/28/2005 8:04:21 AM PDT by
Chiapet
(Cthulhu for President: Why vote for a lesser evil?)
To: NVD
That's because the basic premise of ID is not scientifically testable. It's not science and should not be taught as such.
32 posted on
09/28/2005 8:05:42 AM PDT by
doc30
(Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson