Another fake, but accurate, memo.
How does this story conclude? I do not access NYT site.
LOL, judge Roberts must be driving these folks batty...even when they try to make up some mud to sling at him, it doesn't stick. In fact, it bounces back!
LOL, that's the New York Times for you.
It gets harder and harder to believe that the NY Times once had a good reputation, many years ago.
An article yesterday about Judge John G. Roberts Jr.'s views on libel law attributed a critique of a Supreme Court decision to him erroneously. Mr. Roberts did criticize the decision, New York Times v. Sullivan, in a 1985 memorandum. But a separate unsigned 30-page critique that was among the papers released from his years as a lawyer in the Reagan administration was not his; it was written by Bruce Fein, who was general counsel for the Federal Communications Commission in the Reagan administration. A corrective article appears today, here. (Go to Article)
I can't find what's different about the two articles.
The San Francisco Chronicle is as bad as the New York Times when it comes to malicious distortion and fraudulent reporting of the news of the day. It brings joy to my heart every time I read about layoffs at these toilet papers because it indicates that the end is near for them. I only wish these newspapers and the rest of their ilk would hurry up and just die already.
My list of preferred nominees for the other Supreme Court vacancy includes Bruce Fein - and Mark Levin and Ted Olsen.
How come all their mistakes are against pubbies? Never seem to fall on the other side of the aisle...perhaps the same mechanism at work that forces all dead people to vote democrap.