[Bonaparte]

It's my hope, radioman, that you will take your time responding to the question I just asked you, that you will think it over. There appears to be a significant contradiction in your position and I'd like to see that resolved.

In post 240, you say it's the school's failure to follow their own Christian precepts that bothers you. IOW, it's their hypocrisy (as you see it) that is the problem.

But in your post 247, you seem to say just the reverse, ie. that it's the school's failure to follow the precepts of Deism that bothers you. Deism, which does not subscribe to a providential God, is anathema to Christianity. If this is your position, you would be requiring the school to act hypocritically in order to be in your good graces.

You see the contradiction here, radioman?

[radioman]

But in your post 247, you seem to say just the reverse, ie. that it's the school's failure to follow the precepts of Deism that bothers you.

No, I offered a perspective on my opinion for the sake of honesty. I do not expect a Christian to follow Deist dogma. I would like to see this Christian school follow the precepts of Christianity. This is just my opinion. The school has the Constitutional right to refuse admission to anyone for any reason.
.