[radioman]

But in your post 247, you seem to say just the reverse, ie. that it's the school's failure to follow the precepts of Deism that bothers you.

No, I offered a perspective on my opinion for the sake of honesty. I do not expect a Christian to follow Deist dogma. I would like to see this Christian school follow the precepts of Christianity. This is just my opinion. The school has the Constitutional right to refuse admission to anyone for any reason.
.

[Bonaparte]

"I'm not a Biblical guy."

This is the first thing you've said that I can fully agree with, radioman.

And although you now admit that you're "not a Biblical guy," that doesn't stop you from presenting yourself as a greater authority than Paul, an apostle of Jesus Himself, and passing judgment on Christians who are much more "Biblical guys" than you are.

One fact is inescapable, radioman. If you criticize Christians who reject families that persist in unrepentent sin, then you also criticize Jesus Himself for the same thing. For He commands us to put Him above all others, including our parents.

By her own public statement, quoted in the article, Shay Clark does not place Jesus above her "parents.'" After years of opportunity to love God above these unrepentent sinners, she has chosen the unrepentent sinners over God.

"Unless you repent, you shall not enter the kingdom of heaven."

This entire "family" has remained unrepentent for years. They are as shameless as you are when you call your own self-contradiction "a perspective on my opinion for the sake of honesty." The school is adhering strictly to the teachings and example of Jesus and his apostles.