Thanks for replying. and you said you don't get the talking points,, lol
You seem to confuse conservatism with his tendencies and actions, imo, which again, lend a lot of lip service to the issues at hand and are far from resolved issues and will come back to bite us again and again, imo.
I haven't sat down yet to read thru all the bills vetoed by the Gub, he still 500 plus on his desk awaiting his thorough review thereof,, so far he has signed 350 of 400 submitted to him..
I dare say, he has kaboshed all the silliness submitted to him , right?
You make assumptions and then take the high ground, without thought to the rising debt and you trust, oh do you trust.
Have a good one.
"and you said you don't get the talking points,, lol"
I don't. These are all thoughts I had in my own brain. Do you think me not capable of formulating my own thoughts based on fairly easy observation of the political scene? Perhaps I would impress you more if I used "lol" more often.
He has not been perfect. I admit it. No one is. But he's a significant improvement over his predecessor.
"You seem to confuse conservatism with his tendencies and actions, imo, which again, lend a lot of lip service to the issues at hand and are far from resolved issues and will come back to bite us again and again, imo."
I don't think so. One, I never said he was conservative. I said there had been a move to the right under his leadership. There is a difference. Two, I can't really make out the rest of what you're saying. Is it the tendencies and actions that are going to bite us or conservatism or is it the issues at hand or the far from resolved issues?
Clearly we disagree on Arnold's leadership. I give him credit for his accomplishments where due and criticize him where that's due. You don't see accomplishments, or don't view them as such. That's cool. Just don't be surprised when Arnold's re-election leads to a more rightward-moving state which is something I assume you desire.