"and you said you don't get the talking points,, lol"
I don't. These are all thoughts I had in my own brain. Do you think me not capable of formulating my own thoughts based on fairly easy observation of the political scene? Perhaps I would impress you more if I used "lol" more often.
He has not been perfect. I admit it. No one is. But he's a significant improvement over his predecessor.
"You seem to confuse conservatism with his tendencies and actions, imo, which again, lend a lot of lip service to the issues at hand and are far from resolved issues and will come back to bite us again and again, imo."
I don't think so. One, I never said he was conservative. I said there had been a move to the right under his leadership. There is a difference. Two, I can't really make out the rest of what you're saying. Is it the tendencies and actions that are going to bite us or conservatism or is it the issues at hand or the far from resolved issues?
Clearly we disagree on Arnold's leadership. I give him credit for his accomplishments where due and criticize him where that's due. You don't see accomplishments, or don't view them as such. That's cool. Just don't be surprised when Arnold's re-election leads to a more rightward-moving state which is something I assume you desire.
any right ward movement is being caused by faults in the earth..
--
Clearly we disagree on Arnold's leadership. I give him credit for his accomplishments where due and criticize him where that's due.
Clearly we do disagree, you have a much higher BS tolerance factor than I.
His earth first attitude and propensity to borrow and spend our way out of debt hardly makes me think he is anything close to a conservative.
Gee, we haven't even touched on bonds bonds bonds, bushels of which will be proposed the next few years with him in office,, but the cuts will be few and far between.
How long can we sustain a 10% increase a year in budgets?
I guess we will find out soon enough at this rate.
But that's OK, right?