To: BenLurkin
"He was surprised by the number of homicides — people with gunshot wounds to their heads and backs"I wonder if it would be safe to say that a large number of these could be classified as 'former looters'.
6 posted on
09/26/2005 11:53:18 AM PDT by
GaltMeister
(“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.”)
To: GaltMeister
I wonder if it would be safe to say that a large number of these could be classified as 'former looters'. We prefer the term, "Step 13 of the Looters Anonymous 12-Step Program".
25 posted on
09/26/2005 12:04:29 PM PDT by
savedbygrace
("No Monday morning quarterback has ever led a team to victory" GW Bush)
To: GaltMeister
I wonder if it would be safe to say that a large number of these could be classified as 'former looters'. Unfortunately, many of them could have been "lootees".
65 posted on
09/26/2005 1:03:55 PM PDT by
Polybius
To: GaltMeister
I wonder too if some of the of homicide victims were killed before the storm and the flooding just exposed their bodies? Just a thought. I would want to know if any of the homicide victims had been listed as missing persons before the storm came through.
66 posted on
09/26/2005 1:09:39 PM PDT by
lastchance
(Hug your babies.)
To: GaltMeister
no it wouldn't be safe to say. folks in other areas have already used the white vigilante line.
69 posted on
09/26/2005 1:15:56 PM PDT by
freema
(Ready to Rock AND Roll)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson