Replies

So people in this case are bastards? What other uses of animals do you believe results in a designation of bastard? What about animal test labs. Are they comprised of bastards.

Burning them alive would count as such. Animal test labs still try to prevent as much animal suffering as possible, and their objective is to limit human suffering by discovering new medicines. Darpa would burn animals alive to serve the objective of burning civilians, including children, alive. How can you compare the two?

How about instead of using animals we use completely inanimate atoms, split them apart and annihilate about 100k "non-combatants" in an instant. Look! No animals harmed.

You idiot. I was complaining about peoples lack of respect for life and you think I care more about animals than humans? I think I clearly mentioned how I despised burning people alive. But maybe you have no problem with that. Maybe you have done it yourself and that is why you seem to be personally offended?

And since then we have trained the armed services to increase the yield maximizing the potential deaths of "ordinary citizens". It looks like we're going to need to add the armed services to your list of bastards.

WHAT! Armed services are trained to kill the maximum number of citizens? I dont know what "armed service" you're associated with, but as far as I know military and police are still trying to avoid civilian casualties.

And remember that all this started when you stated that DARPA, an organization comprised of ordinary people would, "have third world children and hobos in their labs" and have "Zero respect for anything but themselves".

If it wasn't illegal they would have third world children and hobos in their labs right now. Zero respect for anything but themselves.

You seriously think they would not experiment on humans? You ever heard of MKultra? Or do you choose to ignore anything those good ol' child bearing board gamers do?

And yes, I think they have no respect for anything other than their own agenda. Unless you use a different definition of respect?

My dictionary says:
1) To feel or show deferential regard for; esteem.
2) To avoid violation of or interference with
3) To relate or refer to; concern.

I consider turning animals into bombs and planning a massacre of non-combatants as "psychological warfare" rather lacking a violation of their rights. It shows no concern for who suffers to serve the Darpa goals either.

What definition of showing respect to others do you have? Fear-based?