Skip to comments.
Andrew Sullivan: Is Bush a socialist? He's spending like one
The Sunday Times ^
| 9/25/05
Posted on 09/25/2005 10:56:29 AM PDT by Uncle Joe Cannon
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260, 261-265 last
To: Keith
Bush is commander-in-chief, and runs our foreign policy...is there anyone here who doesn't doubt his conservative qualifications there? That's all that matters...That would be laughable if not so sad.
261
posted on
09/26/2005 11:40:39 AM PDT
by
Protagoras
(Call it what it is, partial delivery murder)
To: I8NY
It's a shame the Constitution doesn't give President Bush any power to restrict the orgy of runaway spending our liberal congress has engaged in!It's called a veto. It is also called, "not proposing the spending yourself".
262
posted on
09/26/2005 11:42:01 AM PDT
by
Protagoras
(Call it what it is, partial delivery murder)
To: sourcery
[ No, I didn't miss it. Andrew is not a loyal Republican. He doesn't claim to be one. And I didn't say he was one. What I said was that he's not a Democrat. And he's not: He's a Libertarian. ]
A libertarian eh... What libertarian would stump for and vote for John Kerry.? of all people... John Kerry is anathema to any libertarian.. Kerry is RED and Sullivan is PINK.. that must be the linkage.. but then Bush seems to infra-red himself.. Socialism is HOT in Washington D.C. these days..
**-----------
The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism.- Karl Marx
Democracy is the road to socialism. Karl Marx
Democracy is indispensable to socialism. The goal of socialism is communism. V.I. Lenin
"How do you tell a Socialist?- It's someone who reads Marx and Lenin.
Well then; And how do you tell an Anti-Socialist?
Its someone who understands Marx and Lenin" -Ronald Reagan
263
posted on
09/26/2005 11:49:04 AM PDT
by
hosepipe
(This Propaganda has been edited to include not a small amount of Hyperbole..)
To: hosepipe
What libertarian would stump for and vote for John Kerry.?Surprisingly to me, some do go for Democrat candidates (especially the ones for whom social policy is the most important issues.) Some also vote for Republicans. Some would only ever vote Libertarian. Some don't believe in voting (I kid you not.)
Libertarians are viciously divided among themselves over the issue of abortion, and the Israel-Palestinian conflict.
264
posted on
09/26/2005 12:00:29 PM PDT
by
sourcery
(Givernment: The way the average voter spells "government.")
To: hosepipe
What libertarian would stump for and vote for John Kerry.?
Good point! If Kerry had been elected, there would have been gridlock, and would we not have been able to have this wonderful balooning deficit, out-of-control borrowing from China and 33% expansion of the Federal govt.
We might even have seen a repeat of the 1994 Contract w. America when Gingrich et al forced the executive to trim its sails a bit.
Instead we have an exec who constantly proposes new spending schemes, borrows from Communist China to pay for them, and apparently has never even heard of teh word "veto." And all supported by the wonderful (R)s in congress.
Absolute power corrupts, absolutely.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260, 261-265 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson