To: teenyelliott
I completely agree. What's more, an abortion performed past 24 weeks to save the life of the mother isn't, to my mind, necessary. At that point of gestation, the baby has a shot at survival--why not birth the baby, save the mother, and give the baby every chance to live?
The "health" exception is ludicrous.
129 posted on
09/25/2005 6:15:57 AM PDT by
grellis
(Coming in September 2006! SURVIVOR: MORDOR)
To: grellis
I totally agree. Even with Tiller (I live in Wichita, BTW, and am more than familiar with him), why do they have to kill the baby? Okay, say at 26 or 30 weeks or whatever, the woman decided it's time to be done with the pregnancy. Fine. Dilate her, give her pitocin, deliver a premature baby, whisk it away and put it up for adoption. Why do they have to kill them???????
135 posted on
09/25/2005 7:01:09 AM PDT by
teenyelliott
(Soylent green should be made outta liberals...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson