To: grellis
I totally agree. Even with Tiller (I live in Wichita, BTW, and am more than familiar with him), why do they have to kill the baby? Okay, say at 26 or 30 weeks or whatever, the woman decided it's time to be done with the pregnancy. Fine. Dilate her, give her pitocin, deliver a premature baby, whisk it away and put it up for adoption. Why do they have to kill them???????
135 posted on
09/25/2005 7:01:09 AM PDT by
teenyelliott
(Soylent green should be made outta liberals...)
To: teenyelliott
Okay, say at 26 or 30 weeks or whatever, the woman decided it's time to be done with the pregnancy. Fine. Dilate her, give her pitocin, deliver a premature baby, whisk it away and put it up for adoption. Why do they have to kill them???????It's nothing to do with the "woman's right to choose"; It's more about population control (like with cats and dogs).
139 posted on
09/25/2005 7:29:48 AM PDT by
TaxRelief
(Protest discrimination against real scientists at the MSM!)
To: teenyelliott
Why do they have to kill them???????$$$$$$$
I cannot picture an abortionist--and here I include any ob/gyn who performs abortions--even presenting induced labor as an option. There is no money in it. Pure, sick evil, love of money, and bloodlust. There is no ethical or moral reason.
141 posted on
09/25/2005 8:20:57 AM PDT by
grellis
(Coming in September 2006! SURVIVOR: MORDOR)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson