Replies

ARTICLE...."Most damaging to Weldon's claims, the paper said, was the denial it obtained from National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley on Friday - whose spokesman challenged Weldon's assertion that he had given Hadley a copy of the Atta chart two weeks after the 9/11 attacks.

"Mr. Hadley does not recall any chart bearing the name or photo of Mohamed Atta," Frederick L. Jones II told the paper. "NSC staff reviewed the files of Mr. Hadley as well as of all NSC personnel. That search has turned up no chart."

Hadley a member of the Bush administration, is apparently going to deny this all the way...its his word against Weldon's. Somebody is lying.

Ive focused repeatedly on Hadley and his own particular CHART as significant in this investigation...it makes liars out of Slade Gorton and others on the 9-11 Commission.

We now have two people in the current Admin who are noteworthy...

Stephen Campone denying that he witnessed a presentation to Shelton in March 2001 timeframe which allegedly mentioned Able Danger...

Stephen Hadley denying that Atta was on a chart he received from Weldon two weeks after 9-11.

Obviously...both Hadley and Campone need to be put under oath and queried in front of Congress in public hearings.

IMO, although this stuff is POST 9-11, these people are the gatekeepers in getting into the truth about AD and its findings PRE 9-11, and the actions of the previous administration. If Hadley's implied and Gortons direct characterizations of Weldon are allowed to stand...and they WILL be assisted to a large measure by the LIBERAL MSM... as in this article...then any attempts to get at the truth of the Clinton admin and AD will be made much more difficult.

This investigation has to proceed in an orderly, methodical fashion...as a prosecutor would in peeling away layers of an onion.

Lets see what develops....