Posted on 09/24/2005 10:55:28 AM PDT by wagglebee
The Washington Post is challenging the credibility of five members of the Army's elite Able Danger intelligence unit, saying there's no evidence they ever produced a chart identifying lead hijacker Mohamed Atta as a terrorist threat.
The paper declined, however, to dispute the authenticity of a videotape showing a copy of the Able Danger chart, which was displayed by Rep. Curt Weldon during a May 2002 speech to the Heritage Foundation.
Launching the attack in Saturday editions, the Post insisted that investigators and counterterrorism experts find it "improbable -- if not impossible -- that an obscure Defense Department program that used open-source records could identify Atta by name and photograph in early 2000 when he was living in Germany under a different name and had yet to obtain a U.S. visa."
The paper sought to portray Rep. Weldon as a crackpot, saying:
"Weldon is a controversial figure who is vice chairman of the House homeland security and armed services committees and is known for carrying a replica of a suitcase nuclear bomb. His book, which devoted one paragraph to the claim about Atta, focused primarily on allegations by an Iranian intelligence source whom the CIA has dismissed as a fabricator."
Without offering any examples, the Post said Able Danger witnesses had changed their stories:
"Weldon and others who have made the charges have contradicted themselves or provided shifting explanations for important details at the heart of the case, according to interviews, news reports, transcripts and hearing testimony."
Most damaging to Weldon's claims, the paper said, was the denial it obtained from National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley on Friday - whose spokesman challenged Weldon's assertion that he had given Hadley a copy of the Atta chart two weeks after the 9/11 attacks.
"Mr. Hadley does not recall any chart bearing the name or photo of Mohamed Atta," Frederick L. Jones II told the paper. "NSC staff reviewed the files of Mr. Hadley as well as of all NSC personnel. That search has turned up no chart."
The Post also quoted former 9/11 Commissioner Slade Gorton, who declared: "No evidence turns up to corroborate what people think they saw."
In fact, the video of Weldon's Heritage Foundation speech offers strong - albeit circumstantial - evidence that the Able Danger chart did indeed exist - and that it identified lead hijacker Atta.
After unveiling the chart during his presentation, Weldon explained: "I went to the White House. I don't mean to embarrass this guy cause he's a good friend of mine. But I took a mini version of this chart in Nov. [2001] and I turned it over to him - Steve Hadley, who works directly for [then-National Security Advisor] Condi Rice."
While the online version of the Heritage video is too blurry to make out details of the chart, Weldon's description of Hadley's reaction suggests it contained shocking new information.
"This is unbelievable," Hadley allegedly said. "Where'd you get this?"
After being told about Able Danger, Weldon said Hadley told him: "I've got to show this to the man" - meaning President Bush.
In an interview last month, Able Danger Defense Department liaison Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer confirmed that the chart Weldon gave to Hadley featured a photo of Mohamed Atta.
Discussing the Atta chart with ABC Radio host Sean Hannity, Shaffer explained:
"Within two weeks of the attack, this colleague of mine ... she took that very poster to Congressman Weldon. And I have to say he took it right to [Stephen] Hadley, I believe, over at the NSC. It's my understanding that he gave him that chart and Hadley had a great deal of interest in it."
Though the online video of Weldon's Heritage speech isn't clear enough to discern the Atta photo, video enhancement techniques applied to the original recording may yield more than just circumstantial evidence that such a chart existed.
To view the online video of Rep. Weldon's May 23, 2002 Heritage Foundation address, go to: http://www.heritage.org/Press/Events/2002archive.cfm He displays the Atta chart approximately 34 minutes into his presentation.
"focused primarily on allegations by an Iranian intelligence source whom the CIA has dismissed as a fabricator."
The CIA has also dismissed Golitzen as a fabricator.
"The Post also quoted former 9/11 Commissioner Slade Gorton, who declared: "No evidence turns up to corroborate what people think they saw.""
It'd be nice to make him eat those words.
"Anyone who dare crosses the dems will be destroyed."
This time, it may be different.
"The Washington Post should just change its name to the "Washington Enquirer." No, on second thought, that would probably insult The Enquirer, I think the Enquirer has more credibility..."
LOL!
Freepublic will become as "influential" as the MSM in 2006.
WTF will all of those commies, perverts, and baby killers do then.
"They did the same with all the swift boat vets."
Yeah. That failed and so will this.
Gee, it was in the Washington Post?
Well we certainly have to take that newspaper seriously!
Do you believe Weldon is being dishonest?
_____________________
The easiest way to answer that question is to see if his assertions are all over the national media. He is a Republican and the democrat media machine would eat him alive, even if they had to forge half the story.
Nope, not all over the national media machine, in fact, there appears to be a consistent and concerted cover-up effort.
Yep, his statements are TRUE!!!
Funny thing is that he produced a VIDEO TAPE showing that the witnesses HAD provided a chart WITH ATTA'S INFO!
Must have been faked though. You know, the national media's ignoring it so there can't be anything to it ;-)
An all time low, even for the Washington Post
Ah, the same CIA which so ably predicted the fall of the Soviet Union, and so ably prevented 9/11?
I think everyone is missing the point, which is that the Post is citing several specific denials and accusations which could only have been provided to them from one source--The Bush Administration, and the Pentagon and CIA more specifically. I am much angrier at the Administration for stonewalling on Able Danger than I am at the MSM for distorting it with their assistance.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.