Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CarolinaGuitarman
Incredible twists of rational thought went into that post, CG, to allow you to think that man-made science reflects God's truth more than His revealed word.

If I didn't read it for myself, I wouldn't believe that anyone could contort truth to such an extreme.

And even though I didn't bring up the subject and you have inserted it into the discussion, I believe that objective truth should be taught in science class, and not propaganda. That means that when legitimate scientific research is presented that supports ID, it should be openly discussed in science classes so that students aren't given only one side of a two sided discussion (Never did I suggest that Biblical creation should be taught in science class).

Now.........as much fun as it's been, I no longer wish to debate with an intellectual Houdini such as yourself, so I'm leaving this thread.

Perhaps you can contort enough to debate the issue with yourself after I'm gone. You're only a few short steps from it right now......

Bye now. :)

267 posted on 09/25/2005 3:39:02 PM PDT by ohioWfan (If my people which are called by my name will humble themselves and pray......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]


To: ohioWfan
"Incredible twists of rational thought went into that post, CG, to allow you to think that man-made science reflects God's truth more than His revealed word."

First you have to demonstrate your interpretation IS his revealed Word. You take it on faith (no evidence) and expect that to impress everybody. If I hadn't read it again, I wouldn't believe someone could think such a weak argument was a checkmate. Mystical subjectivism as an arguing point! And we're supposed to be impressed!

Just because you want to ignore the World doesn't mean the rest of us want to, or should be made to.

"I believe that objective truth should be taught in science class, and not propaganda."

Good. That counts ID out.

"That means that when legitimate scientific research is presented that supports ID, it should be openly discussed in science classes so that students aren't given only one side of a two sided discussion."

When that day happens, I agree. It hasn't happened yet.

"Now.........as much fun as it's been, I no longer wish to debate with an intellectual Houdini such as yourself, so I'm leaving this thread."

Well, if you can't handle the material, I certainly understand. It requires objective thinking, not appeals to feelings and emotion. Nobody faults you for backing away.

Have a great night!

Please don't ping me again on this thread. I won't ping you back.
270 posted on 09/25/2005 4:16:12 PM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson