Replies

" We are told in two different places about what would happen to those who added and take away from the Word of GOD."

Then why did you choose to invent people other than Noah and his family as having survived the Flood? That is an addition to Genesis.

"One also cannot ignore that Isaiah which Christ quoted said it is not given for all to understand, that is their protection. That being the case, explains full well the "traditions" of man."

This is nonsense. It's the same as, *I can't answer your questions, so I will just say that you are not supposed to understand."

"However, it is the evidence that is sealed into my mind that gives me the ability to call evolution a LIE."

Your Mind, your feelings, your emotions, are not evidence. Or an argument. Lots of people think their subjective mental states have a better *reality* than objective evidence. A good number of them are in mental institutions.
Why should anybody take YOUR feelings as evidence over the evidence of their own eyes?

" The biology/DNA does in fact prove there was more than one race that was created in which the Heavenly Father said was GOOD."

Actually, biology has shown that the category of *race* has no scientific meaning with humans. The usual separations we make (white, black, Asian, and so on...) are very superficial. Other *races* could just as easily be formed using other traits other than skin color. Races based on blood markers can be made; these show a great deal of overlap with the races we are familiar with. DNA shows we are all descended from a common ancestor.

"Only man tries and play primo selection of the different races, sure is not of God. "

I have no idea what this means; please explain more plainly.

"Why isn't Cain listed as one of Adam's generations? Where did Cain go to find a woman? Oh there are other peoples listed as one traces the footsteps of the generations of The Adam "

Just because Genesis makes a mistake, doesn't mean you can just invent other people to fill in Genesis' errors. If these other people were also created apart from Adam, then they wouldn't have eaten of the forbidden fruit and would not have sinned. Adam and Eve's sin would not be theirs. They would be Unfallen children of God. Unless you wish to write a *Fall* story for them too, just like you added to Genesis and created other people surviving with Noah and his family. Maybe you can get your version of Genesis published.

"I do not IGNORE, I take allllllll that is given and based upon the ALLLLLLLLLL given in my limited understand what is now this day as evidence for what was said. I really thought that was a requirement of logic, guess not, guess the evolutionists mind really isn't about logic but rejecting the Heavenly Father and promoting another way."

Logic is not making stuff up to fill in the gaps. You made stuff up.

"Now considering what old Darwin found on his travels maybe he uncovered a "bottleneck" and sought to use this as his evidence that the Bible was not true...."

Um, do you even KNOW what a genetic bottleneck is? It has nothing to do with Darwin. And btw, Darwin didn't set out to prove the Bible was not true. That's your invention (you're very creative, I'll give you that)

"Now who would then be leading Darwin, surely wasn't the Heavenly Father, now was it. "

It was the physical evidence that led Darwin. Something you are woefully ignorant of.

Then why did you choose to invent people other than Noah and his family as having survived the Flood? That is an addition to Genesis.

I did not invent anything.... Genesis 7:15 And they went in unto Noah into the Ark, two and two of ALL FLESH, wherein is the breath of life.

This breath of life is SOUL, the very same word use to described what it was that made The Adam a living being, a SOUL, which evolutionists ignore.

This is nonsense. It's the same as, *I can't answer your questions, so I will just say that you are not supposed to understand."

I did not pen it only know that it was Written Matthew 13:14-15 comes from Isaiah 6:9-10. Reason why no man/woman can have authority to 'damn' another to .ell.

"Your Mind, your feelings, your emotions, are not evidence. Or an argument. Lots of people think their subjective mental states have a better *reality* than objective evidence. A good number of them are in mental institutions.
Why should anybody take YOUR feelings as evidence over the evidence of their own eyes?"

I have not told you what you must believe, you are telling me that I must believe evolution. The WORD stands all on its own with our without me, it is not about what I believe it is what is Written.

Depending upon who is in the position of deciding sanity and insanity are the guard rails of institutions, and you are sure sounding a whole lot like the religionists who declared any and all who fell out of their grace be removed via the acceptable method of the day.

"Actually, biology has shown that the category of *race* has no scientific meaning with humans. The usual separations we make (white, black, Asian, and so on...) are very superficial. Other *races* could just as easily be formed using other traits other than skin color. Races based on blood markers can be made; these show a great deal of overlap with the races we are familiar with. DNA shows we are all descended from a common ancestor."

Well considering that we are alll made in the same form, in the same "IMAGE", and it is characteristics that are gleaned from tiny swabs of DNA that are identifiers, I would say you are not being quite truthful in your attempts to describe what DNA tells.

God said what he formed and created was GOOD, man especially via old Darwin called it survival of the fittest. Anybody with half a brain, considering who old Darwin was and where he came from cannot ignore what is at base of his theorizing about who was most "fit".

"Just because Genesis makes a mistake, doesn't mean you can just invent other people to fill in Genesis' errors. If these other people were also created apart from Adam, then they wouldn't have eaten of the forbidden fruit and would not have sinned. Adam and Eve's sin would not be theirs. They would be Unfallen children of God. Unless you wish to write a *Fall* story for them too, just like you added to Genesis and created other people surviving with Noah and his family. Maybe you can get your version of Genesis published."

Yes and it is written that not all shall have understanding, for their own protection. I made up nobody, read directly what is Written, added nothing, took nothing away and never even got the the parts and places where the words use have different meanings in the original.

"Logic is not making stuff up to fill in the gaps. You made stuff up."

PROVE IT, find yourself one who can actually read what was written in the original Hebrew writing and have him/her tell you what is actually written in Genesis, and by the way, their mouth to mouth traditions do not fit with what is written. Then come back and tell me I made anything up.

"It was the physical evidence that led Darwin. Something you are woefully ignorant of."

Oh you mean an island I will now call "bottleneck" isle.