Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tet68
This argument, it seems to me, comes down to:

“Terrible things are going to happen to our troops in any case, so there is no signficiant down-side if we do at least some of these things to our own prisoners.”

If people are really satisfied with this argument, in appears likely that nothing I can say (or more to the point, nothing that’s said by members of the US military who also question these tactics) is likely to change their minds.

61 posted on 09/24/2005 7:55:14 AM PDT by M. Dodge Thomas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: M. Dodge Thomas

Do not mistake my comparison for acceptance of torture.
Favorable treatment of most prisoners has served us in good
stead in past wars and the Iraq conflict in particular.

Some prisoners cannot be handled with kid gloves however.
We have been fortunate in that no numbers of Allied troops
have been captured, for beatings and pyramids would be the
least of the horrors inflicted upon infidels. (As we have
already seen with others held captive by the fanatics.)


71 posted on 09/24/2005 12:51:57 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson