[Alamo-Girl]

me: because we as yet do not have a full explanation for space/time and energy/matter – it is impossible to say that what we presume is randomness (for instance at the quantum level) is actually random in the system.

you: Freshman-level stoned philosophy major hogwash.

Would you care to discuss the physics?

And on combination v Bayesian probability - and the various types of complexity, would you care to discuss the math?

[orionblamblam]

> Would you care to discuss the physics?

What would be the point? Creationism isn't about physics, logic or evidence. It's about faith that runs counter to all those. Debate is thus virtually impossible. All that's left is appropriately directed mockery.

> would you care to discuss the math?

See above.

[RightWhale]

On the question of how thought causes muscle action, it appears that William James discussed the mind-dust & dualism problems over a century ago. He is the eye in the hurricane.