Sorry, Coyoteman has left the building.
(But be good here, as there could be an encore.)
Ahhh - the battle against religion builds!
Gramsci, Lenin, Marx, and the DNC are smiling!
I almost wish for their "revolution" to start openly - get it all over and done with!
Not accurate.
There is no supernatural being necessary in ID....just an intelligence.
For all we know that intelligence is natural.
How does this translate into "Congress shall make no law....."
Science is constantly operating in, and with, the supernatural. In fact science cannot function apart from it. Science need not necessarily acknowledge or express the supernatural but has shown itself to be less than capable of doing so. Realities of the supernatural are deeper and more certain than anything science can address. As such science serves only as a temporary handmaiden serving (one would hope) the general welfare and satisfying (to a small degree) the curiosity of man.
Throughout all generations certain ones who claim the name of science for themselves have attempted to drive the supernatural out of their midst, but they cannot do so while remaining proponents of science. They can only do so while adorning themselves with philosophical garb and practicing what is inimical to science itself, namely blind close-mindedness.
Yeah like "string theory"... The Quantum "Mechanics" have super natural grease all over their "widdle" hands.. Playing mechanic is quite cute..
Why is 'Intelligent Design' being called 'Supernatural'? When you look at the complexity of the anatomy of humans there is no way we were evolved from the sludge/slime what ever you want to call it.
“There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your
philosophy.”
Why can’t Intelligent Design be part of the evolution equation? Is it feared to be the camel’s nose in the tent?
Alternate Title: Whack-job Creationists attempt to destroy not only the Conservative Movement but hope to overturn a cornerstone of our advanced Western Civilization, 'Science'.
The establishment clause does not concern the contemporary drama of secular humanism enthusiasts trying to remove religion in general or the mere discussion of religious themes and topics from the public realm. This case represents an idiotic misunderstanding of law.
Either Ker Than is an incompetent who doesn't do his homework, or he thinks people are unaware that Darwin, himself, dragged science into the supernatural. Who does he think he's kidding?
"Origin of man now proved. -- Metaphysics must flourish. - He who understands baboon would do more toward Metaphysics than Locke." --- [Charles] Darwin, Notebook M, August 16, 1838 As quoted front and center by Michael T Ghiselin in his book Metaphysics and the Origin of Species