Skip to comments.
Senate Judiciary Supports John Roberts By 13 to 5 Vote
Yahoo News ^
| September 22, 2005
| Thomas Ferraro
Posted on 09/22/2005 6:32:52 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued
The U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday brushed aside concerns of divided Democrats and backed President George W. Bush's nomination of conservative John Roberts to be chief justice of the United States.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; johnroberts; robertshearings
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
To: wagglebee; Ol' Sparky; Paleo Conservative; ambrose; Salvation
All 55 Republicans are on board (RINO's included), and somewhere around 30 Democrats are opposed.
2
posted on
09/22/2005 6:34:50 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(Jeanine Pirro for Senate, Hillary Clinton for Weight Watchers Spokeswoman)
To: Clintonfatigued
3
posted on
09/22/2005 6:35:41 PM PDT
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: Clintonfatigued
to bad mary-jo wasn't around to judge pumpkin head......there is something wrong with this picture when we have ted "hiccup'kennedy and joe "they ain't my words" biden judging judges.......i wonder how the klansmen is gonna vote??? duh!
4
posted on
09/22/2005 6:39:51 PM PDT
by
fatteddy
To: bill1952
Ted Kennedy, Dianne Feinstein, Charles Schumer, Joseph Biden, and Richard Durbin voted "no".
5
posted on
09/22/2005 6:40:57 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(Jeanine Pirro for Senate, Hillary Clinton for Weight Watchers Spokeswoman)
To: AuH2ORepublican
Roberts is on his way in. It's the next nomination that will see the real confirmation fight.
6
posted on
09/22/2005 6:46:45 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(Jeanine Pirro for Senate, Hillary Clinton for Weight Watchers Spokeswoman)
To: Clintonfatigued
Feingold must have decided that he doesn't want to be the moveon.org 2008 candidate.
7
posted on
09/22/2005 6:47:48 PM PDT
by
NeoCaveman
(I support Mike Pence and Operation Offset)
To: Clintonfatigued
Thanks. Was that all of the Dems on committee?
I'll be interested to see how Hillary and the rest of the Dems that are up for reelection in Red States vote.
I'm betting that Nelson(Fl) votes for confirmation.
As for Teddy, shummer, feinstein, biden, and durbin, well, what can we say?
8
posted on
09/22/2005 6:48:49 PM PDT
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: fatteddy
KKK Byrd is going to vote yes. Just heard it on Fox. Of course this is due to the fact he's up for reelection in a red state. Same reason he joined the Gang of 14 idiots. Bunch of phonies.
10
posted on
09/22/2005 6:50:58 PM PDT
by
SoCar
(I fully support John Roberts.)
To: fatteddy
KKK Byrd is going to vote yes. Just heard it on Fox. Of course this is due to the fact he's up for reelection in a red state. Same reason he joined the Gang of 14 idiots. Bunch of phonies.
11
posted on
09/22/2005 6:51:23 PM PDT
by
SoCar
(I fully support John Roberts.)
To: bill1952
Leahy, Kohl and Feingold For, all other Demons against.
12
posted on
09/22/2005 6:52:06 PM PDT
by
msnimje
(Cogito Ergo Sum Republican)
To: SoCar
OOOOOPS!!!
BTW, Hillary is voting no.
13
posted on
09/22/2005 6:52:13 PM PDT
by
SoCar
(I fully support John Roberts.)
To: SoCar
KKK Byrd is going to vote yes. Just heard it on Fox. Of course this is due to the fact he's up for reelection in a red state Byrd is a Constitutional Historian as is Roberts. I bet they really had a great private talk and Roberts charmed and impressed him.
14
posted on
09/22/2005 6:54:42 PM PDT
by
msnimje
(Cogito Ergo Sum Republican)
To: msnimje
15
posted on
09/22/2005 6:55:11 PM PDT
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: fatteddy
to bad mary-jo wasn't around to judge pumpkin head......there is something wrong with this picture when we have ted "hiccup'kennedy and joe "they ain't my words" biden judging judges.......i wonder how the klansmen is gonna vote??? duh! Two, too, or to? Hoo is pumkin head? I am really kunfoosed. Eye just dont overstand. Mae bee I shud kotak mi doktor, an figgur thiz owt.
16
posted on
09/22/2005 6:59:03 PM PDT
by
Cobra64
To: msnimje
Byrd is a Constitutional Historian as is Roberts. I bet they really had a great private talk and Roberts charmed and impressed him.Byrd has **pretensions** to being a constitutional historian. But I've never heard of any sign that the old Grand Master actually is one.
To: Cobra64
dont get you dude.......spell it out
18
posted on
09/22/2005 7:05:07 PM PDT
by
fatteddy
To: dubyaismypresident
I'm sure Feingold wants to create a (phony) image of moderation and that this played into his 'yes' vote, but as with Leahy and the others its probably more so in preparation for the chance that Bush actually nominates a much more solidly known conseravtive for O'Connor's seat. Then they can attck that candidate without mercy and then claim that 'if only Bush had nominated another mainstream conservative (i.e. another O'Connor type they hope) like Roberts' then they wouldn't have to come out so forcefully against the racist, sexist, homophobic, and regressive radical conservative nominee.
19
posted on
09/22/2005 7:14:41 PM PDT
by
Aetius
To: bill1952
No, there are 8 Democrats on the committee. Pat Leahy, Herb Kohl, and Russ Feingold voted to confirm Roberts.
20
posted on
09/22/2005 7:17:30 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(Jeanine Pirro for Senate, Hillary Clinton for Weight Watchers Spokeswoman)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson