"What gives Malkin the moral and scholastic authority to question Myer's qualifications?"
Malkin pays her salary. That's what.
Why does she need "moral and scholastic authority" to question Myers' credentials? By that standard, any voter who has never worked in government would lack the necessary "authority" to question any politician, wouldn't they? I mean, really, how many political analysts have "moral and scholastic authority"?
The questions you should ask yourself is: Is Malkin right?
What about Warren Christopher and George Tenet?
The need to apologize for those people first.
What about Klinton, Klinton, Kennedy, Carter, Jessie, Rev Al, Kerry? Where/What are/were their QUALIFICATIONS?
"What gives Malkin the moral and scholastic authority to question Myer's qualifications?"
The same thing that gives you or I the authority to do the same thing.
She's an American citizen. The goverment works for us. Were are not their subjects.
"This woman may not be qualified. But the dummycrats have no room to complain."
That still doesn't make it right.
"What gives Malkin the moral and scholastic authority to question Myer's qualifications?"
Don't we all have that right?
He appoints a 36 years old, a lawyer and a political appointee with limited executive experience and she is slated to become head of one of the nation's most critical security-related agencies, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE)
And you question Malkin?
What qualifications?