Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Grut

Gee, I thought the Congress was the entity that spends our money.

When Republicans control both the House and the Senate, why exactly is this spending GW's fault?

He could have vetoed the highway bill, but didn't have enough votes to support it.


7 posted on 09/22/2005 1:50:21 PM PDT by A.Hun ("I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do" Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: A.Hun
When Republicans control both the House and the Senate, why exactly is this spending GW's fault?

I guess because he's the responsible adult?

11 posted on 09/22/2005 1:57:41 PM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: A.Hun

"why exactly is this spending GW's fault?"

You're right. It isn't all his fault. Congress is more than half the blame. Still, since they're pubs and therefore ostensibly conservative, that doesn't really make me feel any better.

Also, W has yet to unsheath his veto pen. Not once.


15 posted on 09/22/2005 2:02:36 PM PDT by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: A.Hun
When Republicans control both the House and the Senate, why exactly is this spending GW's fault?

When he hasen't vetoed a bill in 5 years, this argument doesn't fly. Also, he doesn't even talk about cutting spending. A president uses the bully pulpit to set the agenda for his party. This Congress is just following its leader who is marching us down the road of European Socialism.

20 posted on 09/22/2005 2:35:52 PM PDT by Texas Federalist ("There is simply no fat left to cut in the federal budget." Tom DeLay - R? Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: A.Hun
When Republicans control both the House and the Senate, why exactly is this spending GW's fault?

Because he has aided and abetted them. Because he has shown zero leadership in attempting to reduce spending or reduce government. Because he has bent over for every insane spending bill that Congress, the Republican Congress as you pointed out, has passed. He could have changed any or all of those positions.

He could have vetoed the highway bill, but didn't have enough votes to support it.

It would have taken a stand. It would have made a point. He could have shown some loyalty, or at least recognition of core Conservative values. But then he isn't a conservative.

31 posted on 09/22/2005 3:19:38 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson