Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Police Give Woman $100K For 2 Small Bags Of Crack
The Denver Channel ^ | September 22, 2005 | Staff

Posted on 09/22/2005 9:07:35 AM PDT by Millee

A Colorado woman picked up $100,00 for two small bags of cocaine. It's all legal and you may not believe who wrote the check.

It all started with a traffic stop more than two years ago and now, the admitted crack carrier has a check for $100,000. All criminal charges against her have been dropped and the city's police chief said they did nothing wrong. So how can this happen?

Debi asked 7NEWS Investigators to protect her identity but she wants her story told.She admits taxpayers will probably not like that the city paid her $100,000 to settle a civil lawsuit. Debi admits that she was trying to hide crack cocaine and she was trying to hide it in a place she thought no one would look.

During the traffic stop on a street corner in Edgewater, an anonymous caller told police that Debi stuffed something down her pants. When asked, Debi told officers that she was hiding crack cocaine in two small bags and theofficer searched Debi's genital area right on the street, she said.

In her lawsuit, Debi claimed Edgewater police violated her constitutional rights when a female officer conducted what Debi's attorneys call an illegal strip search and an illegal search of her body cavity.

Debi said during the search, she was naked below the waist for anybody on the road to see.

"It's not because they're just nice guys, OK? They're giving her $100,000 because what they did is absolutely outrageous," said Debi's attorney, David Lane.

Lane convinced attorneys for the city of Edgewater to avoid a trial and write the check.

"Taxpayers are giving away their taxpayer dollars because their police don't know the law," said Lane.

Edgewater's police chief disagrees.

"The city has maintained and will maintain that there is no wrongdoing on the part of our officers," said Edgewater police chief Dan Keough.

Even after the incident, not a single officer was disciplined, not a single policy changed.

Keough admits that Debi was charged with possession of illegal narcotics and then all the charges were dropped. However, he said his officers didn't do anything wrong, despite the fact that Debi has a check for $100,000 from the city of Edgewater.

"Well, all I can tell you is we dispute her version of events," Keough said.

Essentially, Edgewater's police chief said the crack-carrying woman lied about what happened on the street corner.

"We are maintaining that we never pulled this woman's pants down or remove any clothes to recover these drugs," said Keogh. He maintains that the officer didn't do a body cavity search.

But the fact is, the police department's own report contradicts the chief's statements. In the report, the officer admitted to using "two fingers" when she "pulled out" one of two small baggies from inside the woman's genital area.

When talking with Keough 7NEWS Investigator Tony Kovaleski asked, "There are people who are going to watch this and say, 'Caught with illegal drugs. All charges are dropped and you get a check for $100,000. Where do I sign up for that program?'"

Keough said, "Sure, I understand that."

Keough said some people may be outraged but he can't control that.

One person apparently not outraged is Edgewater's Mayor Robert Prewitt. He declined an interview on camera but said, "I have no idea why the insurance company passed out the money."

After being charged with a crime, having the charge dismissed and then getting a $100,000 check, Debi said she kinda feels like she won the lottery.

Debi's criminal attorney, Cynthia Sheehan, said, "Edgewater's insistence that the police did nothing wrong is patently absurd. The plain language of the police report is indisputable. The criminal case against (Debi) was dismissed and she was generously compensated. The Jefferson County District Attorney's Office doesn't just dismiss cases and municipalities don't just give away money. Obviously, they did something wrong. An honest admission of that coupled with a change in policy for future cases would seem like the right way to handle this."

So why were the criminal charges dropped? Although it happened with the previous administration, the current Jefferson County district attorney reviewed the facts and concluded criminal charges were dropped because there is physical evidence the drugs were in the woman's body cavity, which would make the search illegal. The prosecutor also said Edgewater police failed to meet the state's burden of proof.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: cocaine; crackkills; donutwatch; governmentlottery; gravytrain; lawsuitlottery; libertarians; warondrugs; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: RightResponse
LOL!!!

Picture of perp, in her hotel room...

21 posted on 09/22/2005 10:01:16 AM PDT by Zavien Doombringer (Have you gotten your Viking Kittie Patch today? http://www.visualops.com/patch.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Millee
"In the report, the officer admitted to using "two fingers" when she "pulled out" one of two small baggies from inside the woman's genital area." Searching a female crackhead should get the officer combat pay!
22 posted on 09/22/2005 10:12:18 AM PDT by Solamente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Millee
They're giving her $100,000 because what they did is absolutely outrageous," said Debi's attorney, David Lane.

Hey,nice work Counselor.You pick up a cool $33K for...what...2 hours of work?

And to think that lawyers in this country can't figure out why they are so completely loathed .

23 posted on 09/22/2005 10:12:24 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ignatius J Reilly
You really think doing out alongside the road in full view was the place to do it??

Number one, the police dispute whether it was done in full view of anyone, and number two, I'm not sure that the simple location of the search can make the search illegal in and of itself.
24 posted on 09/22/2005 10:22:34 AM PDT by andyk (Go Matt Kenseth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Millee

Cops should've taken her back to the station for a strip search. They were planning to arrest her for crack anyway.


25 posted on 09/22/2005 10:24:36 AM PDT by Zeroisanumber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ignatius J Reilly
A dumb and/or overly aggresive cop meets a lawyer and the taxpayers shell out the $$

And apparently, in this case, the cops and their chief learn nothing and will probably go on to cost the local taxpayers more $$$ when they do something similarly dumb again.

26 posted on 09/22/2005 10:32:54 AM PDT by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; Bernard; BJClinton; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
27 posted on 09/22/2005 11:33:17 AM PDT by freepatriot32 (Deep within every dilemma is a solution that involves explosives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andyk
Number one, the police dispute whether it was done in full view of anyone, and number two, I'm not sure that the simple location of the search can make the search illegal in and of itself.

Then why did the settle for $100k and drop the charges?

28 posted on 09/22/2005 11:40:33 AM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta
Then why did the settle for $100k and drop the charges?

I don't know why they settled for $100K. Maybe they're a bunch of idiots? I don't know why they dropped the charges. Maybe because they're afraid of our overly-litigious society?

My question dealt with how the nature of the search, after she admitted possessing the crack, could alter the legality of the search.

Your assumption is that since they paid her $100K and dropped the charges that she is the victim, and the PD is the victimizer. That may very well be true, but there are some questions that the story raises (for me).
29 posted on 09/22/2005 11:53:08 AM PDT by andyk (Go Matt Kenseth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: andyk
Your assumption is that since they paid her $100K and dropped the charges that she is the victim, and the PD is the victimizer.

I do think that because in legal disputes, governments - especially police departments - hold most of the cards.

Police departments have no incentive to settle unless they are going to seriously be screwed if it goes to court. In most cases I've seen, even if the police department loses a case, their budget isn't affected and no one ever gets fired.

30 posted on 09/22/2005 12:13:13 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta
Police departments have no incentive to settle unless they are going to seriously be screwed if it goes to court.

Very true. Furthermore, companies and governments routinely settle cases based on cost/benefit analysis. It's not uncommon to settle out of court simply to save money.
31 posted on 09/22/2005 12:25:02 PM PDT by andyk (Go Matt Kenseth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Millee

I don't understand why this is a suable offense....just fire the officers. Why should money exchange hands?


32 posted on 09/22/2005 12:25:56 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BTHOtu


Man, Whitney is sure ugly without all that makeup. Aw come on, that's not just the drugs. That's just a celebrity caught without her war paint! Look at Oprah!


33 posted on 09/22/2005 12:26:33 PM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: andyk
Furthermore, companies and governments routinely settle cases based on cost/benefit analysis. It's not uncommon to settle out of court simply to save money.

That is very true as well. My point is that the police department must have really screwed up in this case to settle and drop the charges. The tip ended up being correct and they did in fact find crack in her possession.

If they hadn't really exposed themselves they could have bargained with the criminal charge. In this case they probably did, but even with that, they still had to shell out $100k.

34 posted on 09/22/2005 12:44:25 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta
If they hadn't really exposed themselves

The complaint was about exposing others :)
35 posted on 09/22/2005 12:54:49 PM PDT by andyk (Go Matt Kenseth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson