There is no sexual component to the less. This is not sex education. It is simply a matter of saying, this is how human beings form groups with one another.
Seems to me that since kindergarden is exactly the time when children learn to form social relationships, that the information about how adults chose to interact with one another in a non-sexual manner is quite pertinent.
Do you support 'pay to play'? I'm not asking you if it exists. I'm asking you if you support it.
If I have a group and we have an agenda, do you support my group bribing school districts with monies to have the agenda promoted in to the curriculum to benefit my agenda? AND, if you say, 'well that depends what the agenda is', NO. Because, if it is ok for ONE group, then it is ok for any group.
That is exactly what has happened with this 'diverse family' issue. The schools allowed access to their data by GLSEN and merrily take money to promote their agenda.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1481064/posts
A Policy Analysis of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Safer Schools Issues
Did I claim there was one?? "...that the information about how adults chose to interact with one another in a non-sexual manner is quite pertinent."
A five year old needs to learn about how adults interact? Why don't we teach them how children should interact first?
You are willfully ignoring that this is nothing more than indoctination of five year olds into accepting as "normal", various forms of ADULT behavior - it is inappropriate.
Don't be naive. It isn't about how humans form "groups". It's about trying to redifine families. A family is a socially sanctioned unit of related people, joined in order to raise the next generation in a stable environment, and to produce continuity between the generations of society.
Suppose the lifestyle in question was not homosexuality, but sadomasochism. "Johnny lives with his dad, Bruno, and his dad's slave, Kitten, and their trained pony, Stud."