Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Would Reagan Do? (Ann Coulter Laments Bush Not Being More Like The Gipper Alert)
Worldnetdaily.com ^ | 09/21/05 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 09/21/2005 4:54:29 PM PDT by goldstategop

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 761-779 next last
To: Darksheare

It was not meant for you as I recall...oops I meant U!


461 posted on 09/22/2005 12:48:05 PM PDT by whizeup (God Bless the Idiot's, tuff job,someone has to do it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies]

To: whizeup

So?
You post it out there, people will respond to it.
Welcome to FR by the way.


462 posted on 09/22/2005 12:48:48 PM PDT by Darksheare (There is a Possum in the works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 461 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

"If anyone was "on the ball" it was Bush and former FEMA director Michael Brown"

LOL!


463 posted on 09/22/2005 12:52:45 PM PDT by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: Pessimist
I suppose that could lead to a european style system in which coalitions would have to be formed in congress, etc.. But then at least you know where you stand. Much better than this bait and switch approach the pubs have been using on us.

Thanks - I think it would be the best thing of all parties involved. I believe that fiscal conservatives could easily form a bond with those fiscal conservatives that vote for the Democrats because the morality agenda of the GOP scares them.

This is not to bash the social conservatives, but I feel that they scare away and repel more voters than they bring to the table.

It would be best for everyone if there was an anti-abortion and morality party. Maybe that is what the GOP will become when the fiscal conservatives and anti-socialists abandon it.

The fact of the matter is that the current arrangement benefits no one except the democratic party. Even when Republicans win, the democratic agenda is implemented in the form of socialism and legal status of abortion remains unchanged. Social conservatives aren't getting anything out of this deal and neither are fiscal conservatives or those that oppose socialism.

464 posted on 09/22/2005 12:54:29 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 458 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

Okay already...just because I do not know the correct things to do yet on this with pings and all the other stuff does not give anyone the right to keep caling me boy, among the other things that have gone on ..I am not a femi anything..Rush Limbaugh is my favorite and I have a signed autograph from him, so do not think I am not a conservative, I am, just because I do not agree with everything someone says all the time about the President, borders, money ect. does not make me less a CONSERVATIVE!

By the way I loved that song and did not at that time think of it as anti or pro anything...I just loved Helen Reddy's voice ect. I am woman and darn proud of it.


465 posted on 09/22/2005 12:56:26 PM PDT by whizeup (God Bless the Idiot's, tuff job,someone has to do it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 456 | View Replies]

To: Pessimist
No. I don't see that.

She does. Perhaps you don't understand the meaning of "imply". She certainly doesn't credit Bush the elder (why that would undermine her Bush bashing fest).

And notice at the start when, probably having realized by now that Roberts is a Constitutional conservative jurist and she's on record comparing him endlessly and inanely to Souter, she now claims if Roberts turns out to be conservative (he will), she declares it is inadvertant. She's being completely idiotic and, in fact, a bitch.

466 posted on 09/22/2005 12:56:33 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: whizeup

I could care less about your supposed credentials, it's your behavior that needs modifying.
Nothing in your credentials changes how people will respond to your attitude.
IF you keep saying to people "You need to light up" and "I am woman, hear me roar!" as well as saying that posters who have been here far longer than YOU need to join reality, your stay here will be short.


467 posted on 09/22/2005 1:00:09 PM PDT by Darksheare (There is a Possum in the works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 465 | View Replies]

To: whizeup; Darksheare; arasina

Playing innocent now after a not too veiled threat in post #430......


468 posted on 09/22/2005 1:00:58 PM PDT by ohioWfan (If my people which are called by my name will humble themselves and pray......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 465 | View Replies]

To: Pessimist
And to further buttress my charge that Coulter is being idiotic, I offer these two excerpts from this screed column:

Scalia deserved the chief justiceship. He's the best man for the job. He has suffered lo these many years with Justices Souter, Kennedy and O'Connor.

~snip~

Reagan had made a campaign promise to appoint a woman to the Supreme Court. He didn't say anything about appointing a ninny. But back in 1981, it was slim pickings for experienced female judges. O'Connor was a terrible mistake and will forever mar Reagan's record, but at least he did it only once.

Yoo hoo...earth to Ann...earth to Ann:

Reagan nominated Kennedy, too. I guess he made a terrible mistake twice.

469 posted on 09/22/2005 1:01:40 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

"Interesting human dynamic, for all their bluster against the left and their media, some here cannot resist jumping on their bandwagon."


You hit the nail on the head.


470 posted on 09/22/2005 1:03:10 PM PDT by exile (Exile - Helen Thomas tried to lure me into her Gingerbread House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

"What some who want others to think of them as noncomprimising purists, their views are really populist."

Interesting. I've seen people here on various threads posting polling results showing people puportedly like Bush's response to Katrina as if they were vindication. To me it only shows that in fact the general population does lean toward the left.


471 posted on 09/22/2005 1:03:57 PM PDT by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 455 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta; ohioWfan
The terms 'liberal' and 'conservative' are just labels - they have historical meanings but they aren't relevant to the current political environment.

I agree with that. But what underlies this entire debate to me is our citizenry. Where are they? Also, I submit that 90+% of our population does not know or does not appreciate our Constitution. Therefore, if they don't know it, how can they desire to live under it as it is actually written? It would be wonderful if they did, but my question stands. Keep in mind, the actual voters normally get what they want.

Those who seek to have our government delimited by the Constitution first needs citizens who know and appreciate the Constitution, and, desire to live under it. It's no secret that the document is not being taught at grade level nor undergrad level. If it is, you can rest assured that it's with a socialist bent.

In my opinion, the Constitution needs to be "sold" using the average buyer's #1 question: What's in it for me? Once that question is adequately answered, the battle is won.


If you want a Google GMail account, FReepmail me.
They're going fast!

472 posted on 09/22/2005 1:04:43 PM PDT by rdb3 (NON-conservative, American exceptionalist here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies]

To: Pessimist
To me it only shows that in fact the general population does lean toward the left.

If that's the case, how do you overcome it?


If you want a Google GMail account, FReepmail me.
They're going fast!

473 posted on 09/22/2005 1:08:22 PM PDT by rdb3 (NON-conservative, American exceptionalist here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591
He should have been more ahead of the game in appealing to the LOCAL public particularly the residents of NO on Friday night before the hurricane for instance (instead of wasting his time on Blanco on Friday Night), the way he has been this time round with Rita. I really didn't make myself clear enough in my original comment.

By Sunday, with the national announcement, it was too late for many of them to leave.

He declared a state of emergency in Louisiana on Saturday. Whatever your problem is, perhaps you shouldn't be making public pronouncements without knowing the facts.

474 posted on 09/22/2005 1:08:46 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan; whizeup; arasina

I noticed that as well.

"me cordially invite U to Big Sky Country at my humble abode on Cougar Ridge and show U how we debate with nut jobs like U" -whizeup, post 430.

Whiz, let me inform you that threats such as the above quoted text from YOUR POST are not tolerated here.


475 posted on 09/22/2005 1:08:50 PM PDT by Darksheare (There is a Possum in the works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 468 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan; Darksheare; whizeup

I can understand why whizeup mentioned the 'I am woman' thing---because ohioWfan did keep referring to her as a young man. (For some reason I thought so too, BTW.) So we now know she's not a boy, not a feminist and likes to use the juvenile spelling of the word YOU. We also know that she has become extremely rude and crude and ever so slightly threatening. (reference the meeting ohioWfan in person)

Perhaps it can be chalked up to ignorance of Forum Decorum at this point. We will see. :o)


476 posted on 09/22/2005 1:09:00 PM PDT by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 468 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta
" but I feel that they scare away and repel more voters than they bring to the table"

I suspect as much too. But I assume that any number of pollsters already know that one way or the other, and I still see the pubs courting them so...

One reason might be that the morals people tend to be easier to predict based on single issues. Another could be that the main concern of a politician (and party) is the wielding of power - which inherently requires the expansion of gvt. So in relative terms, its easier to placate the morals people than the fiscal people w/out damaging their fiefdom.
477 posted on 09/22/2005 1:10:11 PM PDT by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies]

To: arasina; ohioWfan; whizeup


Agreed, we shall see.


478 posted on 09/22/2005 1:12:10 PM PDT by Darksheare (There is a Possum in the works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 476 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

"If that's the case, how do you overcome it?"

I'm not sure we can or will. Maybe its just the lifecycle of a successful empire. (Look at Rome).

Somewhere here the other day though someone had a good point: Wholesale "voucheriziation" of the school system would be a good start. Hoepefully, people would select schools heavy in education and light in indoctrination.

Then... 'ya just have to wait a generation or two.


479 posted on 09/22/2005 1:13:32 PM PDT by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

Whatever your problem is you shouldn't be making statements without reading the posts.


480 posted on 09/22/2005 1:14:17 PM PDT by TAdams8591
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 474 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 761-779 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson