Posted on 09/21/2005 11:22:21 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Larry Schweiger, President of the National Wildlife Federation, has e-mailed supporters that Sarah James, spokesperson for the Gwich'in tribe of native Alaskans, is in Washington to tell Congress the "truth" about proposed oil exploration in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) and will stay there until Congress votes. Gwich'in objections to drilling have been the centerpiece of environmentalist opposition for years.
It's a compelling story. A poor Alaskan native tribe, calling itself "the Caribou people," fights desperately to save the Porcupine Caribou herd, which roams the region, providing the tribe's sustenance. But that is not the whole story; it is far from the whole truth.
If Ms. James tells Congress the whole truth, she will say that in 1971 the Gwich'in was virtually alone among native tribes in electing not to participate in the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA). To have done so would have required sharing, with the other tribes, in Alaskan natural resource revenues. Instead, the Gwich'in chose to own, control and keep for themselves all revenues from 1.8 million acres in their former reservation.
If Ms. James tells Congress the whole truth, she will say the Gwich'in actively and aggressively sought oil exploration on Gwich'in lands until it was discovered that Gwich'in lands contained no oil. She will say the Alaskan Gwich'in twice leased land to the oil companies she so vilifies today and tried unsuccessfully twice again. She will say that in 1984 she herself signed a request for proposal from oil companies to drill in the totality of Gwich'in lands. She will say that in 2001 the Gwich'in across the Canadian border formed a corporation for oil exploration.
If Ms. James tells Congress the whole truth, she will say the only human threat to the Porcupine Caribou population, estimated to be about 123,000, has thus far been the Gwich'in, whose hunters kill more than 3,000 each year (a fact, not a criticism).
If Ms. James tells Congress the whole truth, she will say the Gwich'in don't live in ANWR, much less anywhere near the proposed drilling site, so her frequent use of the word "local" is a somewhat stretched euphemism. The Inupuit are local to the proposed drilling site, and the Inupuit support exploration.
If Ms. James tells Congress the whole truth, she will explain that ANWR is a land mass of 19.6 million acres. She will say that only 2,000 acres, about three square miles, only one one-hundredth of ANWR, will be explored, and even then by using technologically advanced methods with the least possible surface footprint and disruption. She will say those areas of ANWR specifically designated as "wilderness" and "refuge," some 17.16 million acres, will not be touched, by law.
If Ms. James tells Congress the whole truth, she will verify that the Porcupine Caribou only venture near the proposed drilling area in ANWR's 1.5 million-acre Coastal Plain for approximately two weeks each year, if at all. While the herd does calve in the Coastal Plain, research by this writer using 23 consecutive years of migration data indicates that not once in those 23 years has high-density calving occurred in the proposed drilling area. For 14 of those years, the Porcupine Caribou did not calve anywhere near the proposed drilling area at all. In nine of those years, some outliers of the herd have calved at the fringes of the proposed drilling area.
But what if the Porcupine Caribou decide to calve smack dab on top of the proposed drilling area in years to come? Well, the Central Arctic Caribou herd calves in the Prudhoe Bay area where oil exploration has been intense for three decades. In the early 1970s, while oil exploration there was developing, the population of that herd was estimated at 5,000. Today, it is estimated at 32,000, a more than six-fold increase, at or near range-carrying capacity.
No brief piece can tell the whole story regarding ANWR, oil exploration, the Porcupine Caribou or the Gwich'in. We'll leave that to Sarah James. Mr. Schweiger has promised she will tell Congress the truth. She should tell it all, because this country needs the oil, the more than 200 Alaskan tribes who support exploration need the economic development, and the shameless, deceptive fear-mongering that has stalled exploration for more than a decade needs to end.
-----------
Thomas Humber is founder of the Center for Individual Freedom (www.cfif.org)
--------------------
Note -- The opinions expressed in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, and/or philosophy of GOPUSA.
PING!
Who here thinks Sarah James will tell the whole truth???
Who here thinks Sarah James knows the truth?
Gwich'in be bitchin.
"Porcupine Caribou"
Is that anything like a Jackalope?
Who here thinks Sarah James cares about the truth?
Keep in mind the massive size of ANWR and the small size of the proposed development:
http://www.anwr.org/photo.htm
Well, not like they can build a casino there, is it? Not much of a tourist trade, and I understand caribou suck at blackjack. Might as well try to get the oil companies in while you can.
And if she tells the whole truth, she will reveal that ANWR is subject to no hurricanes.
"Caribou people?"
sorry, Charlie...no such tribe in Alaska...
me thinks we have another "Chief Churchill" in our midst! LOL
The herd is named after the Porcupine river, which runs up the middle of their range.
The herd is named after the Porcupine river, which runs up the middle of their range.
and please correct me if my info is wrong but hasn't the Caribou population increased dramatically since they built the pipeline???
something about them liking the warmth of the pipe or something...
"say honey, wanna go up to the pipeline tonight and make out?" LOL
"Who here thinks Sarah James will tell the whole truth???"
There is only one way to know if Sarah James tells the whole truth.
If the NY Times reports on it, she lied.
"but the pipeline occupies a minuscule area compared to their total range."
and so does ANWR...correct?
Yep.
Bookmarked for my semester project in Technical Writing. I have to do a paper presenting the pros and cons of ANWR drilling..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.