Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Adult Stem Cell Research Shows Good Long-Term Results, Study Says
Life News ^ | 09.19.05 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 09/21/2005 10:07:34 AM PDT by Coleus

Adult Stem Cell Research Shows Good Long-Term Results, Study Says

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
September 19, 2005

Seattle, WA (LifeNews.com) -- Clinical trials of treatments of patients using adult stem cells shows positive results, but doctors have not known whether patients will continue showing progress long-term. A new study of blood cancer patients who had stem cell transplants are nearly as healthy as their peers 10 years later.

Researchers at Fred Hutchinson Research Cancer Center examined 137 patients a decade after their procedures.

Reporting their results in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, the researchers say they were "largely indistinguishable" from the general population.

The finding is important because more than 45,000 receive the adult stem cell transplants each year. No one has benefited from embryonic stem cells, which have caused tumors, convulsions, and patients to reject the cells when inserted.

This study looked at patients who had received haematopoietic cell transplants (HCTs) to replace diseased blood-forming cells produced in the bone marrow, according to the BBC.

Dr. Karen Syrjala, who led the study, said, "Ten years after HCT, the 137 survivors were indistinguishable from case-matched controls in many areas of health and psychosocial functioning."

The researchers also found that the 10 percent of transplant recipients who suffered relapse were in remission by the time of the study.

"The fact that patients can relapse and still have healthy, full lives 10 years later and look like everyone else who has gone through a transplant without relapse is really good news," Syrjala said.

All of the patients received the adult stem cell transplants between March 1987 and March 1990.

The transplant group and the control group had similar rates of hospitalization and outpatient medical visits. They also had similar rates and conditions such as asthma, diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, osteoporosis and hypothyroidism.

The transplant patients did have a higher incidence of muscular and skeletal problems and were more likely to use antidepressant or anxiety medications.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Technical
KEYWORDS: adultstemcells; bloodcancer; fredhutchinson; leukemia; stemcells; stevenertelt

1 posted on 09/21/2005 10:07:42 AM PDT by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...
Stem Cell Treatments Pass The Test

Ten Years After, Stem Cell Transplant Survivors Are Okay

2 posted on 09/21/2005 10:08:40 AM PDT by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus



But, but...how can we justify killing all these babies?


3 posted on 09/21/2005 10:14:03 AM PDT by msnimje (Cogito Ergo Sum Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Gotta ping later.


4 posted on 09/21/2005 10:18:47 AM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

I wouldn't call these stem cells "babies"... in the first place because the stem cells that are used in these treatments come from different parts of the body: those whose grow and regeneration scientists want to stimulate. And in the second place, stem cell research is nowhere close to abortion. God gave us a brain to use it, to research and to improve are life. Use it!


5 posted on 09/21/2005 10:28:57 AM PDT by johny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: johny; msnimje; MHGinTN

I wouldn't call these stem cells "babies"... >>>

What would you call them? The pagans, satanists, marxists and democrats call them: blobs of protoplasm, just cells, nothing but cells, research material, cells, disposable, disposable cells, etc.

embryonic stem cells come from babies.


6 posted on 09/21/2005 10:42:16 AM PDT by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: johny
I wouldn't call these stem cells "babies"... in the first place because the stem cells that are used in these treatments come from different parts of the body: those whose grow and regeneration scientists want to stimulate. And in the second place, stem cell research is nowhere close to abortion. God gave us a brain to use it, to research and to improve are life. Use it!

First - I was being SARCASTIC and using the "voice" of an EMBRYONIC STEM CELL advocate.

Second - Do not fool yourself for a second that the huge machine pushing the Embryonic Stem Cell is about curing diseases, it is about keeping abortion legal.

Third - scientists has been studying ESC for 20 years and STILL have not ever come close to curing or reversing a single disease. In fact, ESC has a very nasty side effect of cause TUMORS as the embryonic cells grow dramatically with no "suicide mechanism."

Fourth - Adult Stem cells research is the only such field that has actually reversed chronic diseases and conditions.

Fifth - you shouldn't be so quick to talk about how other people use their brain when yours is obviously not engaged.

7 posted on 09/21/2005 10:44:27 AM PDT by msnimje (Cogito Ergo Sum Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SirKit

Check out this good news!


8 posted on 09/21/2005 10:48:26 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

bttt


9 posted on 09/21/2005 10:48:59 AM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

In above entry:

Third - scientists has = Third - scientists have


10 posted on 09/21/2005 10:51:38 AM PDT by msnimje (Cogito Ergo Sum Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: johny

"God gave us a brain to use it, to research and to improve are(sic) life." God does not endorse cannibalism. Killing a human for their body parts, to transplant or eat, is cannibalizing others to gain extended life for 'self'. An embryo is merely the earliest age of a human being's personal lifetime begun at conception. You lived through your embryo age, don'tchaknow, else you wouldn't be writing to us on the Net.


11 posted on 09/21/2005 5:44:46 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; b_sharp; neutrality; anguish; SeaLion; Fractal Trader; grjr21; bitt; KevinDavis
FutureTechPing!
An emergent technologies list covering biomedical
research, fusion power, nanotech, AI robotics, and
other related fields. FReepmail to join or drop.

12 posted on 09/25/2005 4:03:29 AM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johny
THE CODE FOR HUMAN LIFE

13 posted on 08/29/2006 11:01:35 AM PDT by Coleus (I Support Research using the Ethical, Effective and Moral use of stem cells: non-embryonic "adult")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson