Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Experts Say Faulty Levees Caused Much of Flooding
Washington Post ^ | Sept. 21, 2005 | Michael Grunwald and Susan B. Glasser

Posted on 09/20/2005 11:38:42 PM PDT by CobaltBlue

Louisiana's top hurricane experts have rejected the official explanations for the floodwall collapses that inundated much of New Orleans, concluding that Hurricane Katrina's storm surges were much smaller than authorities have suggested and that the city's flood- protection system should have kept most of the city dry.

With the help of computer models and visual evidence, scientists at Louisiana State University's Hurricane Center have concluded that Katrina's surges did not come close to overtopping those barriers.

* * * * Ivor van Heerden, the Hurricane Center's deputy director, said the real scandal of Katrina is the "catastrophic structural failure" of barriers that should have handled the hurricane with relative ease.

"We are absolutely convinced that those floodwalls were never overtopped," said van Heerden. * * * * Tuesday, researchers showed numerous indications that Katrina's surge was not as tall as the lakefront's protections. They showed a "debris line" that indicates the top height of Katrina's waves was at least four feet below the crest of Lake Pontchartrain's levees. They also pointed out how the breached floodwalls near the lake showed no signs of overtopping -- no splattering of mud, no drip lines and no erosion at their bases. They contended that the pattern of destruction behind the breaches was consistent with a localized "pressure burst," rather than widespread overtopping.

Their model indicates that most of the surge around the lake and its nearby canals was less than 11 feet above sea level, and that none of it should have been greater than 13 feet. The Army Corps's flood-protection system for New Orleans was designed to handle surges of more than 14 feet above sea level.

"This should not have been a big deal for these floodwalls," said oceanographer G. Paul Kemp. There's no way this should have exceeded the capacity."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: army; cary; construction; corps; engineers; floodwalls; katrina; levees
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-320 next last
To: CobaltBlue
Fine ones, much better than me,...

My hopes are in your statement my FRiend.

141 posted on 09/21/2005 1:19:03 AM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

Uh oh. Pesky facts.


142 posted on 09/21/2005 1:19:26 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue

Like OJ?

The lawyers made a killing.

No justice was served.


143 posted on 09/21/2005 1:20:54 AM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Bingo.


144 posted on 09/21/2005 1:20:54 AM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DB; All
Speaking of irony,

Here we have a lawyer who sees the flooding as a quick way to make a buck.

But the incompetent political hack who was the FEMA head was a lawyer-turned-horse show official.

Then there were the lawyers at the Sierra Club, going to court to prevent the Corps of Engineers from raising and strengthening the very levees that failed in New Orleans. The plaintiff in the lawsuit didn't want the work done until extensive and expensive environmental impact statements were prepared by the Corps of Engineers and approved by the EPA.

I say we just give all these lawyers guns, lock them in a room, and see who emerges as the winner.

Then, when the one surviving lawyer comes out-- shoot him!

145 posted on 09/21/2005 1:20:56 AM PDT by zipper (Freedom Isn't Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Well, which is it, they do or they don't get paid before the client wins? Up the thread you said that plaintiff attorneys don't get paid unless the client wins. You're all over the place.

Sadly, I think you are overly empassioned about this subject, have formed your opinion, and are unwilling to consider CobaltBlue's very clear replies.

Take a step back, sleep on the subject, then return to it when you are more calm and composed.

That'll be $50.00, please (I only work pro bono when the client isn't being obstinant).

146 posted on 09/21/2005 1:22:25 AM PDT by Aracelis (If you see me on another Crevo thread, please kick me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
This would be handled in the US Court of Claims.

You could be right. It's been years since I handled a Tucker Act case. Mostly I do Civil Rights Act cases.

147 posted on 09/21/2005 1:24:52 AM PDT by CobaltBlue (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Aracelis

I guess us ignorant little people should shutup and "learn" eh?


148 posted on 09/21/2005 1:25:08 AM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
In any case, these flood controls worked as designed.

You might be right and you might be wrong. The engineers in the article I linked say otherwise.

149 posted on 09/21/2005 1:26:48 AM PDT by CobaltBlue (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
How does her having "credentials" mitigate the fact that she's looking for somebody, anybody to sue to make some money? It's opportunist and very NON-conservative.

Oy! You really need a chill-pill. Making money legitimately IS a basic concept in the free-market...which, by the way, is quite the Conservative mindset.

If CobaltBlue can demonstrate that individuals or organizations were negligent and caused deaths...then shouldn't she pursue these entities? This then becomes a moral obligation. If she makes some money on the way, big deal. Do you work for free? If so, perhaps you'd be more comfortable in North Korea.

150 posted on 09/21/2005 1:28:13 AM PDT by Aracelis (If you see me on another Crevo thread, please kick me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
people who were too dumb to realize they lived BELOW SEA LEVEL

And therefore, if the levees were improperly constructed, they should have no recourse?

151 posted on 09/21/2005 1:28:59 AM PDT by CobaltBlue (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Aracelis

Actually what I am is insulted at the mockery some attorneys have made of the law.

When an attorney uses phrases like "...and I should get in on it" and "...there's money in it for sure" and "...it doesn't get any deeper than Uncle Sugar" we all pretty much know what we're dealing with here.

A dressed up ambulance chaser.


152 posted on 09/21/2005 1:30:45 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Aracelis
Making money legitimately IS a basic concept in the free-market...which, by the way, is quite the Conservative mindset

What planet are you on?

153 posted on 09/21/2005 1:31:58 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue

It's called contributory negligence.


154 posted on 09/21/2005 1:32:32 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: zipper
Then, when the one surviving lawyer comes out-- shoot him!Ouch!

That reminds me of the two attorneys stranded on a deserted island and while on lookout atop a tree one of them sees a naked blond in distress in the ocean.

He calls to the other attorney to go and save her and after the successful rescue the two attorneys got together and looked at the lady in distress and found her to be oh so beautiful.

One of the attorneys asked the other one "Since she's so beautiful, should we screw her?"

And the other attorney replied, "out of what?, She's naked and destitute"!

155 posted on 09/21/2005 1:32:46 AM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: DB
I guess us ignorant little people should shutup and "learn" eh?

You may be an engineer, but comments like this one...

"Anyone that's had any involvement in the court system knows it has extremely little to do with "honesty" and a whole lot more to do with a "free lunch" for one party or the other."

...lead me to believe that you just might, perhaps, maybe, oh heck, probably not learn anything new. Therefore, go ahead and blab away. Your opinionated ignorance is very obvious.

156 posted on 09/21/2005 1:33:06 AM PDT by Aracelis (If you see me on another Crevo thread, please kick me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
Did you know that all things have a probability of failure regardless of how "well" engineered it is?

Everything could well have been done as designed and still not performed as expected. It doesn't mean someone is at fault or responsible. There are often consequences in trying to defy nature. Living below sea level near the sea has risks no matter how you cut the cake. And responsibility lies there first.
157 posted on 09/21/2005 1:33:06 AM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
With so much death and destruction, you know everybody is searching for a deep pocket, and it doesn't get any deeper than Uncle Sugar.

True. But if IIRC from high school civics class, the government has to "agree" to be sued.

158 posted on 09/21/2005 1:33:18 AM PDT by jslade ("If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried." (Seminole Cty, FL))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Oh, I should always be too pure to take money for the work I do? Pro bono all the time, like a priest or a nun?

What kind of conservative are you?

One with a trust fund, maybe?

The lawyers you love get paid by insurance companies to make sure that they don't have to pay off, even when the claims are valid. That doesn't bother you?


159 posted on 09/21/2005 1:33:40 AM PDT by CobaltBlue (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue

Actually, I worked for PLAINTIFF attorneys most of the time.

Wrong again.


160 posted on 09/21/2005 1:34:40 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-320 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson