Skip to comments.
NY Times Cutting 500 Jobs, 4 Percent Of Work Force
WNBC in New York ^
| 9/20/05
| The Associated Press.
Posted on 09/20/2005 2:19:20 PM PDT by Sprite518
NEW YORK -- The New York Times Co. said Tuesday it would cut 500 jobs, or about 4 percent of its work force, as part of an ongoing effort to reduce costs. The reductions come atop another 200 jobs that were cut earlier this year.
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: layoffs; liberalmedia; newspapers; nyt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: TheCrusader
Personally, I find the Times scratchy and not absorbent enough. Even after repeated applications, I never feel really clean "down there."
To: Sprite518
A bit of good news today!
42
posted on
09/20/2005 2:48:07 PM PDT
by
mtbopfuyn
(Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
To: Norman Conquest
To: Sprite518
4% = good start
downside: 500 more panhandlers and squeegee wipers
44
posted on
09/20/2005 2:50:07 PM PDT
by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
To: rhetorica
I think the NYT's Gay Newsroom Caucus has first claim on the pink slip. They take turns wearing it at Guild meetings.
To: ml/nj
The WSJ is family owned. Cramer did a thing on them the other night on Mad Money. He said the family (can't remember the name) isn't in it for the money, they just want 'their' kind of paper.
46
posted on
09/20/2005 2:51:56 PM PDT
by
Roccus
(BEWARE of stupid people in large numbers.)
Comment #47 Removed by Moderator
To: Crawdad
Moderator, please delete my post 47. Thanks.
48
posted on
09/20/2005 2:52:59 PM PDT
by
Crawdad
(I cried because I had no shoes, until I saw Kathleen Blanco on TV.)
To: Crawdad
49
posted on
09/20/2005 2:54:20 PM PDT
by
Crawdad
(I cried because I had no shoes, until I saw Kathleen Blanco on TV.)
To: alisasny
But wait! These are people's jobs...everyone should have a job, whether they are needed or not.
Funny how the NYT seems to think socialism is a great concept except when it is their money at stake!
I feel bad for those losing their jobs, but I love seeing the NYT constricting, tightening, trying to stay relevant and viable.
Perhaps we will be able to see someday in our lives: "NYT to close doors..."
After that, we can start counting the days until the Boston Globe, Washington Post and LA Times follow that same path.
This is like "The 8th Sense" (of course, out of respect to "The Sixth Sense" where the kid sees dead people, and "The Seventh Sense" where he sees gay people) in "The Eighth Sense" he sees dead newspapers...they just don't know they are dead...
50
posted on
09/20/2005 2:54:37 PM PDT
by
rlmorel
("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
To: rlmorel
But wait! These are people's jobs...everyone should have a job, whether they are needed or not.
I wonder ... are these union jobs?
everyone should have a union job
To: CyberAnt
And .. They still don't get it! Pssssssst! They don't want to get it.
52
posted on
09/20/2005 2:58:38 PM PDT
by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: rhetorica
>>>I nominate Maureen Dowd for a pink slip!
Me, me, me, me, me too!
Sorry to copy her writing style. Count the number of I's and me's in her "writings." It's truly amazing.
Hoppy
To: Sprite518
Outsourcing to Al Jeezera?
54
posted on
09/20/2005 3:03:54 PM PDT
by
showme_the_Glory
(No more rhyming, and I mean it! ..Anybody got a peanut.....)
To: Sprite518
Shouldn't Krugman, Dowd, Herbert, Rich, etc. practice what they preach and each take a huge pay cut in order for some of their fellow employees to keep their jobs?
I thought they believed in sacrificing for the common good.
55
posted on
09/20/2005 3:05:10 PM PDT
by
texasmountainman
(proud father of a U.S. Marine)
To: texasmountainman
Oh you know the leftist NEVER practice what they preach..
To: Sprite518
Can't trust these print media outlets and one has to look for accuracy and no spin news at other places, unless you allow these scribes to convert you into unquestioning liberal followers.
Just look at these poor same minded Europeans.
Besides, as an Investors Business Daily poll revealed regular print media readers are the most negative news consumers.
Readership declines, good, perhaps that gets the message of needed changes at their news sections towards accuracy and impartiality across.
57
posted on
09/20/2005 3:06:55 PM PDT
by
hermgem
To: Sprite518
It would be best if the editors and publishers took major pay cuts. Isn't that what dems always call for? What about the little guys? Why should they suffer while the corporate fat cats stay fat? Off with their heads..(hehe)
58
posted on
09/20/2005 3:09:02 PM PDT
by
stocksthatgoup
(Polls = Proof that when the MSM want your opinion they will give it to you.)
To: Sprite518
How about cutting your liberal content instead?
59
posted on
09/20/2005 3:10:16 PM PDT
by
FOG724
(RINOS - they are not better than leftists, they ARE leftists.)
To: FOG724
Oh you know they will not do that......
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson