Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Results of AP-Ipsos Poll on Bush (guess from the title which way the numbers went)
AP ^ | 9/20/2005

Posted on 09/20/2005 1:58:12 PM PDT by Leroy S. Mort

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Some slight improvement, but let's not say that in the headline........
1 posted on 09/20/2005 1:58:14 PM PDT by Leroy S. Mort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort

At 40% Bush is doing great....


MORE BUSH NUMBERS (CONT'D) [Byron York]

On the other hand, I recently asked Gallup to send me a chart of every presidential job approval it had ever taken -- they go back to Franklin Delano Roosevelt. What it shows is that every president in the last 40 years has had a low point in which his job approval ratings went into the 40s or 30s, and sometimes lower.

Bill Clinton hit 39 percent job approval in August and September 1994. George H.W. Bush hit 29 percent in July 1992, and 33 percent in October of that year. Ronald Reagan hit 35 percent in January 1983. Jimmy Carter hit 28 percent in June 1979. Gerald Ford hit 37 percent in March 1975. Richard Nixon spent most of 1974 in the 20s, hitting 24 percent just before his resignation. And Lyndon Johnson hit 35 percent in August 1968.


2 posted on 09/20/2005 2:02:40 PM PDT by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort

Looks as if the speech from last week did allot of good. I was expecting a slight bounce...


3 posted on 09/20/2005 2:04:01 PM PDT by ruschpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frankjr
Polls had Bush at 41% and 42% in September 2003 among 'likely voters'. That means his approval was 38% and 39% among 'national adults' in September 2003. Democrats salavated then too. BUSH 51 - KERRY 48
4 posted on 09/20/2005 2:05:53 PM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort

B. How confident are you that the money being appropriated to rebuild Iraq is being spent wisely?

Very confident, 7 percent

Somewhat confident, 28 percent

Not too confident, 31 percent

Not at all confident, 33 percent

Not sure, 1 percent

TOTAL CONFIDENT - 35 percent

TOTAL NOT CONFIDENT - 64 percent

I don't want to be too picky, but I'd put 'Not too confident' in the 'Total Confident' instead of the 'Total Not Confident' total. Or not summarize them to begin with.


5 posted on 09/20/2005 2:05:57 PM PDT by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
AP Poll: Democrats oversampled over Republicans by 10 POINTS. http://www.ipsos-na.com/news/client/act_dsp_pdf.cfm?name=mr050920-1top.pdf&id=2787
6 posted on 09/20/2005 2:08:31 PM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort

AP Poll:

Democrats oversampled over Republicans by 10 POINTS.

http://www.ipsos-na.com/news/client/act_dsp_pdf.cfm?name=mr050920-1top.pdf&id=2787


7 posted on 09/20/2005 2:09:11 PM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frankjr
Rephrase the question to read "B. How confident are you that the money being appropriated to Fill in the blank with any government program is being spent wisely?" and I bet you'd get much the same answer.
8 posted on 09/20/2005 2:10:59 PM PDT by Leroy S. Mort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
AP Poll: Democrats oversampled over Republicans by 10 POINTS.

No surprise there.

9 posted on 09/20/2005 2:12:33 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Cindy Sheehan, Pat Buchanan, John Conyers, and David Duke Are Just Different Sides of the Same Coin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

This is even though in the 2004 Election the GOP and Dems voted equally.


10 posted on 09/20/2005 2:13:57 PM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
As Rush once said, "Polls are now used to make news, not report on it" or something to that effect.
11 posted on 09/20/2005 2:15:12 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Cindy Sheehan, Pat Buchanan, John Conyers, and David Duke Are Just Different Sides of the Same Coin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
Democrats oversampled over Republicans by 10 POINTS.

As bad as things have been for the president and fact he is losing Republicans and independents, who knows the percentage of Republicans could have dropped to from what it was at election. Even before the past month there were all the conservative kooks that care about nothing about immigration or the deficit that were upset with Bush. May be the Dems do outnumber the Republicans. Only thing that can save us is when the DEms open their mouths.

12 posted on 09/20/2005 2:16:06 PM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dave S

Actually, this poll is garbage.

Bush hit "All-Time Lows" in March 2003, September 2003, January 2004, April 2004 and May 2004.

Polls had Bush as low as 41% among 'likely voters' and 38% among 'national adults' as late as May 2004.

People have not changed their minds. Pollsters have changed their samples.


13 posted on 09/20/2005 2:19:03 PM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

"AP Poll: Democrats oversampled over Republicans by 10 POINTS. http://www.ipsos-na.com/news/client/act_dsp_pdf.cfm?name=mr050920-1top.pdf&id=2787"

Thanks for the link. These polls are not based on a true random sample. The demographics are skewed along with the results. It also supports the issue of polling over a weeked (more dems sitting at home drunk hoping for someone to call...where as repubs are out and about - and maybe still drunk). I wish they would show a split on the approval rating based on party affiliation. At least someone could then calc a weighted number. The pollsters say they don't like to do that because party affiliations change. Maybe over the long run, but not this dramatic in less than a year.


14 posted on 09/20/2005 2:24:01 PM PDT by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dave S

CBS/NYTimes Poll: Iraq Taking Toll On Bush

NEW YORK, May 24, 2004

The President’s approval rating has dropped to a new low of 41 percent, and more than six in ten say the country is heading in the wrong direction.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/05/24/opinion/polls/main619122.shtml


Newsweek Poll: Bad Days for Bush

With news from Iraq becoming ever bleaker, the president’s numbers are way down.

May 15 - As his administration grapples with the fallout from the Iraqi prisoner abuse scandal, President George W. Bush’s approval ratings have dropped to 42 percent, according to the latest NEWSWEEK poll, a low for his presidency. Fifty-seven percent say they disapprove of Bush’s handling of the war in Iraq. And 62 percent say they are dissatisfied with the way things are going in the United States, a number that has been steadily increasing since April, 2003, when it was 41 percent.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4986882/


ZOGBY POLL:

Released: May 16, 2004

Bush's Job Approval Drops to Record Low 42%; Kerry Up By 5 Points Over Bush 47%-42%; Iraq Disapproval Rate Rises to 64%; Majority Says US Headed in the Wrong Direction and "It's Time for Someone New" New Zogby International Poll Reveals

http://zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=826


15 posted on 09/20/2005 2:25:44 PM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort

this is a push poll.


16 posted on 09/20/2005 2:28:03 PM PDT by BoBToMatoE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BoBToMatoE

All AP-Ipsos polls are push polls.

Garbage in garbage out.


17 posted on 09/20/2005 2:32:43 PM PDT by tomahawk (Proud to be an enemy of Islam (check out www.prophetofdoom.net))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
Bush already got reelected so these polls really don't mean a thing to him but on the other hand, these polls could be a bad sign for the new age conservatives in Washington, the spend it even if you ain't got it conservatives.
18 posted on 09/20/2005 2:47:15 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

The list of areas not sampled because of hurricane damage represents possibly 10% of Bush's support. These polls are absurd.


19 posted on 09/20/2005 2:51:12 PM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
Always remember that IPSOS means lie in some foreign language that only rats speak. IPSOS = Greenberg = Clinocchio = lies. Never trust anything that bunch says.
20 posted on 09/20/2005 3:14:19 PM PDT by jmaroneps37 (The quisling ratmedia: always eager to remind us of why we hate them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson