Skip to comments.
Internet Explorer more Secure than Mozilla products
News.com ^
Posted on 09/20/2005 8:24:40 AM PDT by markedmannerf
Mozilla Web browsers are potentially more vulnerable to attack than Microsoft's Internet Explorer, according to a Symantec report.
But the report, released Monday, also found that hackers are still focusing their efforts on IE.
The open-source Mozilla Foundation browsers, such as the popular Firefox, have typically been seen as more secure than IE, which has suffered many security problems in the past. Mitchell Baker, president of the foundation, said earlier this year that its browsers were fundamentally more secure than IE. She also predicted that Mozilla Foundation browsers would not face as many problems as IE, even as their market share grows.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.com ...
TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Technical
KEYWORDS: firefox; internetexplorer; isthisbizarroworld; mozilla; security; tech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: markedmannerf
Why not one word here on using Netscapes browser? I use the new 8 and it seems fine. It is somehow related to or uses Fire Fox based stuff. (I am no geek so excuse the ignorance) I have not been infected in any way that I know and I've been using it fro years. I have tried FF and for some reason it screws up my display settings. (on my home computer) I use FF at work and like it.
21
posted on
09/20/2005 8:55:06 AM PDT
by
hophead
(" Enjoy Every Sandwich WZ")
To: Hurricane Andrew
hogwash. many of the vulnerabilities occur if you go to the wrong site. it is balderdash to say "if the exploit is out there it is already to late". if you wait a full month or two for M$ to decide to decide to issue its patch,
that might be too late...
by the way folks, anyone get the feeling that the symantec report was very, very carefully orchestrated for microsoft skipping this months patch??
as for the differences between IE and FF, since I made my kids stop using IE and start using FF the spyware and virus infections on our home machine (Windows ME protected by a firewall) have gone to zero...
22
posted on
09/20/2005 9:01:40 AM PDT
by
chilepepper
(The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
To: Red Badger
Yep. It's nice not to need to run a half a dozen programs just to protect my machine from IE weaknesses.
23
posted on
09/20/2005 9:06:27 AM PDT
by
jess35
To: markedmannerf
BROWSER TRAFFIC.... Here is a plot showing the percent of page views for each of the three main browsers. The data are taken from the >1,800,000 page views for my
www.varmintal.com site over the 17 month period. FireFox is on the rise. Internet Explorer and Netscape are losing ground. What is that saying and it could be applied to FireFox?
"If you build it, they will come."Good Hunting... from Varmint Al
To: Hurricane Andrew
Secunia shows these currently unpatched vulnerablities: IE 19, Firefox 3, and Opera 0.
The Symantec analysis is far less relevant to browser security.
25
posted on
09/20/2005 9:24:50 AM PDT
by
mdefranc
To: Hurricane Andrew
"The reality of the situation, however, is that Firefox has experienced 25 vulnerabilities during the first half of the year, with 18 being critical. IE, on the other hand, has experienced 13, with 8 of those being critical. So to say that IE has more problems just doesn't "add up" so to speak."No. The reality of the situation is that Microsoft has only acknowledged 13 vulnerabilities. If you continue reading the article you'll find this: "There is one caveat: Symantec counts only those security flaws that have been confirmed by the vendor. According to security monitoring company Secunia, there are 19 security issues that Microsoft still has to deal with for Internet Explorer, while there are only three for Firefox."
Firefox might not be perfect, but Microsoft won't even admit they have a problem.
To: ShadowAce
Secondly, as Firefox is open source more people have access to the code base, so they are free to look for bugs. Ah, the old, discredited "security through obscurity" argument. You're an idiot if you rely on it.
Comment #28 Removed by Moderator
To: OldSkewlLibertarian
but right around the time it starts to get really bad, another browser will pop up and be the darling for a while Opera just went really free. It's a good browser (arguably better than Firefox in ways), and will probably gain more marketshare now that the free version has no more ads. Try it out.
To: Fresh Wind
Microsoft haters are a lot like Bush haters.I'm no Microsoft hater. I use Windows XP, Windows Mobile, Word, Excel, Access, Powerpoint, etc and am overall pleased with those products.
All I know is that spyware and popups have been minimized (virtually eliminated) since I started using Firefox and I love using tabbed browsing in Firefox and how easy it is to customize it.
30
posted on
09/20/2005 10:15:13 AM PDT
by
Anti-MSM
(Conservatives wish 9/11 never happened. Liberals pretend it didn't!)
To: antiRepublicrat
> Opera just went really free. It's a good browser (arguably better than Firefox in ways), and will probably gain more marketshare now that the free version has no more ads.
Totally agree!
Download the new, ad free Opera 8.50 here
--
Lee Harvey,
Opera user since 1999
To: All
For those who'd like to read Symantec's 106 page
Internet Security Threat Report Volume VIII, you can
download the PDF here (after submitting the web form).
Enjoy.
To: dhuffman@awod.com
To: chilepepper
"Windows ME"
blahhhaaaaaaaa!!! loser!
34
posted on
09/20/2005 2:35:01 PM PDT
by
postaldave
(dont ask me, i'm just a simple post birth, tissue mass.)
To: Varmint Al
my current stats are showing a much lower MS number. i can't graph it from last year but this is a big change in numbers for me at
5united.net MS Internet Explorer No 56895 78.1 %
Firefox No 8626 11.8 %
Safari No 3753 5.1 %
Mozilla No 1682 2.3 %
Netscape No 969 1.3 %
Unknown ? 444 0.6 %
Camino No 161 0.2 %
Opera No 122 0.1 %
WebCollage (PDA/Phone browser) No 48 0 %
Konqueror No 44 0 %
Others 46 0 %
35
posted on
09/20/2005 2:42:07 PM PDT
by
postaldave
(dont ask me, i'm just a simple post birth, tissue mass.)
To: chilepepper
Balmer says so, so it is true.
DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! (somebody get me a towel)
36
posted on
09/20/2005 5:33:04 PM PDT
by
Arkinsaw
To: chilepepper
hogwash. many of the vulnerabilities occur if you go to the wrong site. it is balderdash to say "if the exploit is out there it is already to late". if you wait a full month or two for M$ to decide to decide to issue its patch, that might be too late...
You can apply the same logic to Microsoft, as well. To wit, their vulnerabilties aren't exploitable unless you visit a malicious site.
by the way folks, anyone get the feeling that the symantec report was very, very carefully orchestrated for microsoft skipping this months patch??
Well, I suppose if you don't have the facts on your side, you can always resort to innuendo and conspiracy theory. But those things are weak substitutes for the truth...
as for the differences between IE and FF, since I made my kids stop using IE and start using FF the spyware and virus infections on our home machine (Windows ME protected by a firewall) have gone to zero...
Tell them not to surf so much porn...
37
posted on
09/20/2005 5:35:07 PM PDT
by
Bush2000
(Linux -- You Get What You Pay For ... (tm)
To: Bush2000
I own a small business which contracts with several vendors whose sites have all those activeX widgets on them, so we HAVE to run IE. I have win4lin on my box, and run IE off that. For the girls who do admin and sales, two of them have XP boxes. I have told them they can surf anywhere they want (porn doesn't seem to be a problem, so I left it at "anywhere"), but they have to use Opera on everything but vendor sites. I have seen a NOTICEABLE decrease in the spyware and adware crap that has to be cleaned out of their machines.
Many anti MS people are not zealots, we just want something secure that works. What turns us INTO zealots is the anticompetitive, smug, "we own the market so go screw yourself" attitude of MS. It is a universal human reaction to see a playground bully get his nose bloodied and cheer the kid who did it to him. It is also good for MS to feel a bit of panic, although it would engender less ill will if they actually addressed problems by concentrating on FIXING the problems than by becoming FUD central. There is a reason why Steve Ballmer is the most hated man in American business, and it ain't the size of his bank account.
To: manwiththehands
Turn off the Pop-Ups.
Edit,Preferences,Privacy & Security,PopUps, check "block unrequested popups"
Problem solved, unless you use webmail that requires java script because this will block the "compose" window from coming up.
39
posted on
09/21/2005 2:55:01 AM PDT
by
ChefKeith
( If Diplomacy worked, then we would be sitting here talking...)
To: markedmannerf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson