Posted on 09/17/2005 9:08:12 PM PDT by neverdem
The young man had taken gone outside in the early evening and found a grizzlie in the chicken coop. It alerted on him and charged. He killed it with 20 ga slug.
My son shot and killed a 375 black bear with with the same gun this young lady is using. He happen to have the .243 barrel attached and not the 20ga barrel.
The young man had taken gone outside in the early evening and found a grizzlie in the chicken coop. It alerted on him and charged. He killed it with 20 ga slug.
My son shot and killed a 375 lb black bear with with the same gun this young lady is using. He happen to have the .243 barrel attached and not the 20ga barrel.
Now, he doesn't have the health to do so, but I still enjoy making things go bang. Heck, I've even encouraged my hasband to "allow" me to expand the MManor arsenal, and he's now finally agreed.
If you teach your kids to respect the tool, and how to handle it, then later they can make a decision to go hunting.
Donate the meat to a charity feeding the poor. If it's not too tasty, well that's why our Creator gave us spices. New Jersey is so over populated with black bears that the head of the NY Department of Conservation sent a letter to its NJ counterpart an official letter to resume bear hunts. N.Y. wildlife official wants N.J. bear hunt. They are killing pets. One killed an infant in Sullivan County, NY. Woodridge Focus Of Tragedy
RH"And here is where we will never agree."
Uh, have you heard of "Eddie Eagle"?? Firearms training should start as early as the parent thinks the child can absorb the teaching. Firearms safety training can start as soon as the kid can understand "don't touch the stove".
See comment# 284. Whether it is sportsmanlike or not, these critters need to be controlled. If someone uses dogs, that's their business, IMHO.
We don't feed oats to no dead horses, so please stop trying to feed this one.
In each reply I've repeatedly said in a variety of ways that though I adamantly disagree, parents are the people who should make the decision whether or not to arm their little kids. I just don't have to like it or respect it.
"I should tell you I'm from Long Island. And where I live, it's illegal to have chickens or horses and whatnot."
Even though it diminishes every year, there is still a lot of agricultural land on the island, especially out east. And on the subject of guns, my wife grew up on Long Island with guns in the house. Her brother went hunting with his uncle all the time.
IIRC, you're going to college in Brooklyn. Let me take a wild guess. You don't drive, do you? Otherwise, I don't know how you missed watching all the trailers with race horses being hauled, coming and going on Long Island's highways.
Thanks but it's easier just to use woolite.
Of course 55 years ago, when a certain family of boys, (not me) veiwed the finding of a skunk on the way to school as a day off, it might have been very handy for the teacher to have had around.
Don't judge Texas by the veiw's of Racehorse. Hunting and fishing or alive and thriving. There are however, no public lands for hunting. So you either need to know somebody or get an expensive lease. Of course leases do prevent overhunting, and you know the skill/common sense level of the other hunters on a lease with you.
Never said it wasn't. So, I don't know what you're talking about.
The dead but still contorting horse has to do with loading up babies with firearms. That's all.
I agree, and I grew up with a family of hunters.
I have no problem with people hunting for food. It's their choice.
I do have a problem with people enjoying killing living things.
I don't know what the Times is trying to do except try to make money, increase circulation, live down a well earned reputation for being biased and still have an obvious bias just from looking at their titles. Take a gander at their digital front page on which this story is a minor link, and compare it to the images of the city and national editions, respectively. Go figure.
(URL=http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2005/09/18/nytfrontpage/scan.jpg)
(URL=http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2005/09/18/nytfrontpage/scannat.jpg)
Aww the NY Slimes is so two faced they are sending their reporters here for other than reporting reasons....
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,16646618%255E23289,00.html
Oh you poor thing.
However, I know in Jamaica, Queens there are some Carribean "places" where you can buy eggs and live animals and have them "Processed" for you. My daughter usually buys rabbits for Easter Dinner there. Her God-Father has a (strange ?) sense of humor.
When I lived in Richmond Hill I used to take my Polish Mother in law there. Sutphin blvd. I think.
If you're really nice to them, they will even catch the blood for you in a jar, with a small amount of vinegar. Then you can make the Polish black soup delicacy called "chuenyenna".
LOL! Thanks for the link. I'll post it later if nobody else has.
You're right. I did attribute a thought to you that you didn't make. My apologies.
"Also I believe there were nutritional benefits."
I'm pretty sure that, before the invention of vitamin pills, meat was probably the best way to ingest a good variety of vitamins. To put it simply, let the animal roam the environment, eating all sorts of different plants, each with a few vitamins and minerals. Then eat the animal and get it all at once. Since the invention of vitamin pills, I think the nutritional rationale for meat eating is weaker.
"I don't agree with this but I can't believe this on the cover of the Slimes."
Don't agree with what? That the kid should be hunting?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.