Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/17/2005 1:03:22 PM PDT by jscottdavis_for_48th_district
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jscottdavis_for_48th_district
I hope he includes help to busnesses impacted by movie companies disrupting access to their location, while the all-important job of movie-making takes place.
2 posted on 09/17/2005 1:07:34 PM PDT by Churchillspirit (Anaheim Angels - 2002 World Series Champions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jscottdavis_for_48th_district

The taxpayers of California must be thrilled to pay more so the "film companies" can have a tax break. I suspect that through creative accounting the companies and performers aren't paying nearly what they should now.


3 posted on 09/17/2005 1:08:15 PM PDT by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jscottdavis_for_48th_district

How about a little union busting while we're at it? (Not that I really care much about the fate of Hollywood)


6 posted on 09/17/2005 1:13:34 PM PDT by Cosmo (Liberalism is for girls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jscottdavis_for_48th_district

As I understand it, movie companies like to film in Canada, due to the relative weakness of the Canadian dollar. Toronto has been used in a number of films to simulate American cities.

No offense to our Canadian bretheren, but definitely Ontario and the entertainment industry seem ideally matched.

Regards, Ivan


7 posted on 09/17/2005 1:13:58 PM PDT by MadIvan (You underestimate the power of the Dark Side - http://www.sithorder.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jscottdavis_for_48th_district
Not a brain in his steroid fried head, give those clowns a tax break to leave town would be a better idea.
8 posted on 09/17/2005 1:14:19 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jscottdavis_for_48th_district

Please, we really don't want them in Oregon.


15 posted on 09/17/2005 1:19:36 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jscottdavis_for_48th_district
The article included at your referenced link was written Feb 28, 2005.

Update (FR thread):
Runaway Film Bill Hits Snag - State lawmakers balk ...
Los Angeles Times, September 8, 2005:

SACRAMENTO — Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's script to stem runaway film production in California with as much as $100 million in annual tax breaks is getting panned at the Capitol.

The bill by Assembly Speaker Fabian Nuñez (D-Los Angeles), which the governor made a top priority, was on the legislative fast track until Schwarzenegger's fellow Republicans balked, arguing that it amounted to a giveaway for Hollywood. Now, the bill can't even get a hearing.

With the scheduled legislative recess looming late today, Schwarzenegger and Nuñez are considering a switch in tactics. Nuñez said he hoped to line up verbal commitments from legislative leaders to put the proposed movie tax credits into the state budget for the spending year that begins in July.


19 posted on 09/17/2005 1:25:56 PM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jscottdavis_for_48th_district

No one sees movies anymore because TV has never been so good. The producers of films are now pumping out great, film-quality footage, effects and soundtracks on TV. I would stack "24", "Lost", "The Shield", "House, M.D." and "Battlestar Galactica" up against any film for substance, quality and impact. It seems that fully half the crap Hollyweird puts out these days are weak horror and zombie flicks and horribly cliched romantic comedies, where everyone knows exactly what's going to happen from ten minutes in.


21 posted on 09/17/2005 1:27:34 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jscottdavis_for_48th_district

Arnie may be onto something and be doing himself a favor by currying the same...


25 posted on 09/17/2005 1:38:04 PM PDT by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jscottdavis_for_48th_district
The proposal would be aimed at "below-the-line" workers -- the carpenters, electricians and makeup artists who represent the bulk of the entertainment industry's middle-class work force and who rarely travel when productions are filmed out of state.

The carpenters and electrician unions have priced themselves out of business. The studios can go non union and cut costs dramatically. Taxpayers shouldn't have to subsidize union labor.

27 posted on 09/17/2005 1:46:30 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jscottdavis_for_48th_district
The liberal film industry can't earn enough income while pushing their anti-America - anti-values agenda, so now the state of California is going to pay them to do it.
30 posted on 09/17/2005 1:50:02 PM PDT by Patti_ORiley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jscottdavis_for_48th_district
BTW, for a candidate for public office to come to FreeRepublic advocating tax breaks for a leftist industry within his district takes a special kind of chutzpah.
38 posted on 09/17/2005 2:28:30 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jscottdavis_for_48th_district

Good for Schwarzenegger.


47 posted on 09/17/2005 3:32:49 PM PDT by Black Tooth (The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

If RINOld had half a set he would propose
TOTAL ELIMINATION OF THE CA STATE INCOME TAX!

FL & TX operate without one!
No reason why CA can't too!


48 posted on 09/17/2005 3:45:08 PM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jscottdavis_for_48th_district
Welcome aboard Mr. Davis.

I urge you to follow your dream and run for public office. Seek office in a "tough" political subdivision. Your views are moderate enough that you can compete in a historically liberal leaning district and if you succeed you'll have done a great service to our state.

Good luck to you sir.

49 posted on 09/17/2005 4:38:02 PM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jscottdavis_for_48th_district

Arnold has finally made a good move. Despite conservative hatred of Hollywood, California needs it to stay afloat, the entertainment industry is its biggest. Canada and a few states have been killing California recently with incentive plans for studios.


53 posted on 09/17/2005 5:13:08 PM PDT by youthgonewild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jscottdavis_for_48th_district
Hollywood is the one big business I wish they would drive out of So. Cal...
62 posted on 09/17/2005 5:41:37 PM PDT by tophat9000 (This bulletin just in:"Chinese's Fire Drill's" will now be known as "New Orleans' Hurricane Drill's")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
That Schwarzenegger intends to provide a tax break to a sector of California's business community should, on principal, irritate few on this forum. That his administrative authority and celebrity is being used to promote a state subsidy of California's motion picture industry will surprise no one, absolutely no one. What should concern us all is how he intends to finance this subsidy.

If he intends to utilize funds derived from the additional $10B bonding approval that he seeks through prop 76 or will simply increase California's annual budget to accommodate his largess, Schwarzenegger will be perceived as another European liberal doing his old business cronies a favor because he can. Still others will see his support as consideration for Nunez's support on unrelated matters, not necessarily public knowledge and probably equally specious.

If, on the other hand, Schwarzenegger proposes to approve and fund Nunez's legislation through cuts in existing state spending, instead of raising taxes or borrowing money, he will earn a modicum of my respect.

78 posted on 09/17/2005 8:12:41 PM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson