Skip to comments.
The AP: Never Have So Few Kept So Many in the Dark for So Long
Special to FreeRepublic ^
| 17 September 2005
| John Armor (Congressman Billybob)
Posted on 09/17/2005 12:15:26 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
This is, IIRC, the first time I've ever clicked the button for "Breaking News." The reason is that part of this story is a "confession" on behalf of James Lee Witt, which I received in a private e-mail a 2:42 this a.m.
I Googled Hildebrand so I have a reasonable idea of who he is (a leftist Clintonista). But I'd appreciate more information on him from those who've followed his trail.
John / Billybob
To: Congressman Billybob
The AP does nothing more than produce press releases for the Democrats.
2
posted on
09/17/2005 12:17:14 PM PDT
by
dr_who_2
To: Congressman Billybob
3
posted on
09/17/2005 12:18:18 PM PDT
by
cgk
(When the BIG ONE wipes out Hollywood can we call it Bush's Fault instead of the San Andreas Fault?)
To: Congressman Billybob
4
posted on
09/17/2005 12:21:06 PM PDT
by
onyx
(North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
To: Congressman Billybob
Tell Bush to ban them from the White House grounds and issue a press release listing all of their deceptions and exclusions. This would destroy AP.
To: Congressman Billybob
Every time I hear "AP" I think "A$$HOLE PRESS"
6
posted on
09/17/2005 12:24:43 PM PDT
by
msnimje
(Cogito Ergo Sum Republican)
To: dr_who_2
Are you sure it isn't the other way around?
To: Congressman Billybob
Bump--rather daring! Is there a La. ping list?
8
posted on
09/17/2005 12:26:42 PM PDT
by
Mamzelle
To: Congressman Billybob
9
posted on
09/17/2005 12:29:58 PM PDT
by
Unicorn
(Too many wimps around.)
To: Congressman Billybob
If this is true, is it possible Witt was not really hired by Blanco to protect and serve her.
Was he forced upon her by the Klintons to have him close to the spin machine in an attempt to protect these and other frauds?
10
posted on
09/17/2005 12:30:56 PM PDT
by
msnimje
(Cogito Ergo Sum Republican)
To: Congressman Billybob
The Impeach Blanco site has a video clip of her admitting she should have asked fo the Nationa Guard earlier. Also lots of other great stuff.
http://www.impeachblanco.org/
11
posted on
09/17/2005 12:32:16 PM PDT
by
msnimje
(Cogito Ergo Sum Republican)
To: Congressman Billybob
As far back as 9 years ago puts it under the clintoonian administration and under Witt, the latter now working for the state govt the money went to. HHHmmmmmnnnnn!!!
To: Congressman Billybob; Blurblogger
13
posted on
09/17/2005 12:33:57 PM PDT
by
dixiechick2000
("Virtute et armis" - By valor and arms)
To: dr_who_2
14
posted on
09/17/2005 12:40:57 PM PDT
by
MEG33
(GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
To: Congressman Billybob
15
posted on
09/17/2005 12:45:29 PM PDT
by
jdm
To: Republican Wildcat
If I'd meant to state it that way, I would have. But I didn't.
16
posted on
09/17/2005 12:46:21 PM PDT
by
dr_who_2
To: Congressman Billybob
"The IEM press release that contains the erroneous information has been disappearing and reappearing, another sign of something suspicious with IEM.
The last press release I can find on their website
is dated February 16, 2005.
17
posted on
09/17/2005 12:47:40 PM PDT
by
dixiechick2000
("Virtute et armis" - By valor and arms)
To: dixiechick2000
The press release referred to is the one that I noted was changed, which announced the IEM contract award in 2004. Originally it announced that James Lee Witt Associates was a "partner" in the project.
AFTER my article on Witt, the original 2004 release got modified. The date was the same, but a footnote appeared, claiming that Witt Associates were not involved in carrying out the project. I have in hand screen captures of the release, before and after it was mysteriously changed. LOL.
John / Billybob
18
posted on
09/17/2005 12:59:37 PM PDT
by
Congressman Billybob
(This Freeper was linked for the 2nd time by Rush Limbaugh today (9/13/05). Hoohah!)
To: Congressman Billybob
You've all heard of a military coup. This is a media coup.
19
posted on
09/17/2005 1:05:08 PM PDT
by
aimhigh
To: Congressman Billybob
Ohhhh...I see.
Thank you for the clarification.
"AFTER my article on Witt, the original 2004 release got modified. The date was the same, but a footnote appeared, claiming that Witt Associates were not involved in carrying out the project. I have in hand screen captures of the release, before and after it was mysteriously changed."
LOL!
Why, you sly devil. ;o)
Excellent sleuthing!
If Witt's spokesman knows about the fraud, then Witt does, too.
I wonder why he would leave himself so exposed?
As far as a reporter being interested in asking him about this, don't hold your breath.
He was part of the exhalted Clinton administration, after all.
20
posted on
09/17/2005 1:10:26 PM PDT
by
dixiechick2000
("Virtute et armis" - By valor and arms)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson