Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Strong Anti-Roe Nominees Off Table??? (I hope it's not True)
The Supreme Court Nomination Blog ^ | 13 June 2005 | Tom Goldstein

Posted on 09/17/2005 9:43:37 AM PDT by HapaxLegamenon

Roe's Influence on the Choice of the Nominee Candidates > Jones | 06:14 PM | Tom Goldstein | Comments

Second, and directly relevant to the President's ongoing process of selecting a nominee to replace Justice O'Connor, the article attributes to "[s]ources close to the White House" the fact that Edith Jones "is no longer under serious consideration." The reason "in part" is "concerns that her strongly voiced views against abortion would alienate Collins, Snowe, and other Republican moderates."

(Excerpt) Read more at sctnomination.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Maine
KEYWORDS: 109th; collins; edithjones; jones; judicialnominees; rinos; scotus; snowe; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
I hope this is not True.
1 posted on 09/17/2005 9:43:38 AM PDT by HapaxLegamenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HapaxLegamenon

You and me both. Doesn't nixing all pro-life judges create a de facto "litmus test"?


2 posted on 09/17/2005 9:48:07 AM PDT by Tall_Texan (RIP New Orleans 1718-2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HapaxLegamenon

You may hope it's not true, but if even moderate Republicans won't vote for her, there's no sense nominating her.

We need a more stealth candidate who we think will vote against it, but whose public utterances can't be used against her. Or him.


3 posted on 09/17/2005 9:51:56 AM PDT by Peach (South Carolina is praying for our Gulf coast citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HapaxLegamenon
If Bush nominates a moderate to replace O'Conner then five years of a GOP President (with a GOP-dominated congress for the majority of that time) wouldn't have changed the balance of SCOTUS one iota.

Let's hope that doesn't happen.

Roberts replacing Rehnquist + moderate replacing O'Conner = Wash

4 posted on 09/17/2005 9:52:13 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan; BlackElk

If this is the case, then it is time to purge the pro-aborts from the Republican Party. It would be better if these seats were Dem. The realignment of the parties' political axis and regional strengths must continue. These quislings undermine the mission of the party (which for some of us is not merely to win elections to get jobs for our buddies).


5 posted on 09/17/2005 9:54:05 AM PDT by sittnick (There's no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Peach

But We CONTROL the Senate. That should be the end of the questioned.


6 posted on 09/17/2005 9:56:15 AM PDT by HapaxLegamenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

I agree. But with Spector, Snowe, Collins etc, do we really have a majority?


7 posted on 09/17/2005 9:57:21 AM PDT by HapaxLegamenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HapaxLegamenon

Has Bush Disappointed us yet as far a Court nominations! NO! Things are going to be just fine!


8 posted on 09/17/2005 9:57:41 AM PDT by zzen01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HapaxLegamenon

This is wishful thinking by the pro-death crowd.


9 posted on 09/17/2005 9:58:48 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (9-11 is your Peace Dividend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HapaxLegamenon

Justice Ann Coulter.


10 posted on 09/17/2005 9:59:06 AM PDT by SevenDaysInMay (Federal judges and justices serve for periods of good behavior, not life. Article III sec. 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Correct, Peach.

POTUS will nominate a strict constructionist/Constitutionalist without a long paper trail.

Demcorats already know that 'strict constructionist and Constitutionalist' are code words for "conservative."


11 posted on 09/17/2005 9:59:27 AM PDT by onyx (North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HapaxLegamenon

We control the Senate, but if we can't get the votes, even among our moderate Republicans, there's no way the nominee will be accepted. It's unfortunate, but there it is.

And for those freepers who say they will never vote for a Republican again (for various reasons), this is a case in point why it's so important to not only maintain our majority, but increase it.


12 posted on 09/17/2005 10:02:15 AM PDT by Peach (South Carolina is praying for our Gulf coast citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HapaxLegamenon

I too hope it is not true.


13 posted on 09/17/2005 10:03:02 AM PDT by Houmatt (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SevenDaysInMay

I would love a front seat for those hearings!


14 posted on 09/17/2005 10:03:52 AM PDT by HapaxLegamenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SevenDaysInMay
Oh, would I have a wet dream if Bush ever had the gonads to nominate her.
15 posted on 09/17/2005 10:05:38 AM PDT by Houmatt (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HapaxLegamenon

Unfortunately we do not control the Senate. The Democrats + Democrats-in-GOP-clothing (Specter, Snowe, Chafee, et al) form a solid majority in that chamber.


16 posted on 09/17/2005 10:06:35 AM PDT by thoughtomator (Gentlemen may cry, "Peace! Peace!" -- but there is no peace. - Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: zzen01
Has Bush Disappointed us yet as far a Court nominations! NO! Things are going to be just fine!

No, but Souter wasn't a disappointment either until he was already on the Court.

I like Roberts, its seems he is going to be great, and while I like Bush, this "lets not p-off Spector, Snowe, etc", seems too close to his "new tone" style which never wins us anything.

There, I have vented, hopefully it will turn out well.

17 posted on 09/17/2005 10:07:52 AM PDT by HapaxLegamenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Any names or sources on potential nominees?


18 posted on 09/17/2005 10:12:17 AM PDT by HapaxLegamenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: HapaxLegamenon

Note that this article is dated June, so things could be different now.


19 posted on 09/17/2005 10:16:25 AM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HapaxLegamenon

POTUS will thread the needle and make 99% of us happy. He is NOT going to make a Souter mistake like his father. GW is not a POTUS that can be pushed around, coerced or intimidated.

Most everyone is thinking he will HAVE to nominate a woman, and for sure a minority. Janice Rogers Brown comes to mind...lol.


20 posted on 09/17/2005 10:30:22 AM PDT by onyx (North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson